Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36267837›Full record

SynthesisBioMed research international2022

The Impact of Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio in Febrile Seizures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Samaneh Hosseini, Hossein Gharedaghi, Sina Hassannezhad, Shahram Sadeghvand, Amirhossein Maghari, Saeed Dastgiri, Mahnaz Talebi, Shokoufeh Khanzadeh

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BioMed research international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Samaneh HosseiniNeurosciences Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Hossein GharedaghiSchool of Medicine, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran.
Sina HassannezhadCardiovascular Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Shahram SadeghvandPediatric Health Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Amirhossein MaghariDepartment of Family Health, Social Determinants of Health Research Center (SDHRC), Ardabil University of Medical Sciences, Ardabil, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0449-4805
Saeed DastgiriTabriz Health Services Management Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Mahnaz TalebiNeurosciences Research Center (NSRC), Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Shokoufeh KhanzadehStudent Research Committee, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4177-8746
Tabriz University of Medical Sciences · IRArdabil University of Medical Sciences · IRZanjan University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This meta-analysis was conducted to determine the relationship between neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and febrile seizure (FS). Our study was registered with the PROSPERO (ID: CRD42021259944). Web of Science, Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and ProQuest Central were searched, and finally, 17 studies were included. Standardized mean difference (SMD) was reported with a 95% confidence interval (CI) for the NLR levels. Compared with the febrile control group, the FS patients' NLR levels were significantly higher (SMD = 0.49; 95%CI = 0.26 to 0.72,

Indexed as

NeutrophilsSeizures, FebrileBiomarkersChildFeverHumansLymphocytesBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID36267837
PMCPMC9578816
OpenAlexW4304588733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.