ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2022
Preclinical systematic review & meta-analysis of cyclosporine for the treatment of myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury.
Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ultrasound-driven microbubble motors for targeted myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury treatment.Materials today. Bio · 2026Article
- Melatonin and mitochondrial protection in cardiac ischemia-reperfusion injury: mechanisms, evidence and translational perspectives.Basic research in cardiology · 2026Review
- Myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury after acute myocardial infarction: spatiotemporal mechanisms and endotype-matched multi-target modulation by compounds from traditional Chinese medicine.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Cardioprotective Signaling: Outline and Future Directions.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- The Mitochondrial Permeability Transition Pore in Platelets: Mechanisms, Physiological Roles, and Therapeutic Perspectives.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Mitochondria dysfunction, a potential cytoprotection target against ischemia-reperfusion injury in a mouse stroke model.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2025Article
- Advances in Chinese herbal medicine in modulating mitochondria to treat myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury: a narrative review.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2025Review
- Reducing mitochondrial dysfunction through combination therapy to limit ischemia-reperfusion injury in male DCD rats.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Protective effects of cyclosporine and its analog NIM-811 in a murine model of hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury.Liver research (Beijing, China) · 2024Article
- Cyclosporine A Does Not Mitigate Liver Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury in an Ex Vivo Porcine Model of Donation After Circulatory Death.Annals of transplantation · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Though best known for its immunosuppressant effects, cyclosporine A (CsA) has also been studied as a treatment to mitigate ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) by its inhibition of the mitochondria permeability transition pore (mPTP). Despite numerous preclinical studies supporting its benefit in reducing infarct size following myocardial IRI, large randomized controlled clinical trials have been unable to show a beneficial effect. Exploring existing preclinical data can give us the opportunity to revisit some the assumptions that may have led to the failure of these studies to translate clinically. Herein, we present a systematic review of preclinical studies testing CsA to attenuate myocardial IRI (PROSPERO CRD42020159620). Methods: We conducted a systematic search of health research databases Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, Web of Science BIOSIS, and Scopus, as well as Cochrane and PROSPERO systematic review databases, on March 9, 2022 for non-human Results: We identified 71 studies, 59 of which were studies of coronary occlusion. Overall, 75% of studies reported a clear positive effect of CsA in mitigating myocardial IRI by some clinically relevant parameter (e.g., infarct size). A meta-analysis including 43 coronary occlusion studies showed an overall reduction in infarct size with CsA treatment (16.09%; 95% CI: -18.50% to -13.67%). Subgroup meta-analyses identified species, age, timing of administration, and duration of ischemia as factors potentially affecting the efficacy of CsA in the setting of myocardial IRI. Conclusions: Our systematic review and meta-analysis identifies questions that have yet to be answered by preclinical studies, highlighting important differences between these and clinical studies that should be addressed prior to proceeding with any further clinical studies using CsA to treat IRI in the heart or other organs. We also use the example of CsA to highlight general considerations for researchers attempting to translate animal studies into the clinical setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.