ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2022
A finite element analysis of the supportive effect of a new type of rotary support plate on lateral tibial plateau fractures.
Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Biomechanical comparison of a novel hockey-stick locking plate with a pes anserinus sparing design for Schatzker IV tibial plateau fractures.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Article
- Biomechanical comparison of double mini-locking plate versus lateral locking plate for Danis-Weber B distal fibula fractures.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
- A collaborative approach of finite element method and machine learning algorithms for biomechanical analysis of implants used in tibial shaft fractures.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
- Segmentation and finite element analysis in orthopaedic trauma.3D printing in medicine · 2025Article
- Regional bone density patterns of the tibial plateau: implications for finite element analysis.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Breaking the treatment dilemma of Schatzker IV fractures: finite element analysis validates hybrid single-plate with tension screw fixation for synergistic optimization of stability and minimally invasive outcomes.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- How Does the Stress in the Fixation Device Change during Different Stages of Bone Healing in the Treatment of Fractures? A Finite Element Study of External Fixation for Tibial Fractures.Orthopaedic surgery · 2024Article
- [Research progress on biomechanics for internal fixation in tibial plateau fracture].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2024Review
- Finite element analysis of a novel anatomical plate in posterolateral plateau fractures.Frontiers in surgery · 2024Article
- Biomechanical analysis of internal fixation system stability for tibial plateau fractures.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Tibial plateau fractures (TPFs) are a challenging type of fracture in orthopedic traumatology. We previously designed a plate (Patent Number: CN201520195596.5) for posterolateral TPF combined with posterior lateral collapse.. In this study, finite element analysis was used to compare the biomechanical characteristics of two internal fixation methods for posterolateral TPF. We investigated the support effect of the new steel plate on lateral TPFs combined with posterior TPFs. Methods: Two models of complex TPF were established. Model A was fixed with the new type of plate, and model B was fixed without the plate. Three axial loads of 500, 1,000, and 1,500 N were applied using FEA on the two fracture models (A and B) to analyze the data. Results: In model A, the maximum displacement at 500, 1,000, and 1,500 N was 0.085797, 0.17043, and 0.25465 mm, respectively; the maximum stress of the bone block was 11.285, 20.648, and 29.227 MPa, respectively; and the maximum strain of the bone block was 0.0012474, 0.007435, and 0.0035769 mm, respectively. The maximum displacement of the internal fixation was 0.096932, 0.18682, and 0.27655 mm, respectively; the maximum stress was 69.54, 112.1, and 155.71 MPa, respectively; and the maximum strain was 0.00066228, 0.0010676, and 0.0014829 mm, respectively. In model B, the maximum displacement of fractures at 500, 1,000, and 1,500 N was 0.15675, 0.29868, and 0.44017 mm, respectively; the maximum stress of the bone block was 6.5519, 12.575, and 18.842 MPa, respectively; and the maximum strain of the bone block was 0.0032554, 0.0074357, and 0.012146 mm, respectively. The maximum displacement of the screw was 0.14177, 0.27109, and 0.39849 mm, respectively; the maximum stress was 48.916, 92.251, and 135.27 MPa, respectively; and the maximum strain was 0.00046608, 0.00087893, and 0.0012887 mm, respectively. Conclusions: The fixation method using this type of plates and screws can replace other methods using two plates to fix complex TPF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.