Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36267703›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in molecular neuroscience2022

Automatic autism spectrum disorder detection using artificial intelligence methods with MRI neuroimaging: A review.

Parisa Moridian, Navid Ghassemi, Mahboobeh Jafari, Salam Salloum-Asfar, Delaram Sadeghi, Marjane Khodatars, Afshin Shoeibi, Abbas Khosravi, Sai Ho Ling, Abdulhamit Subasi and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in molecular neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
12.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 112 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 11 institutions in 8 countries.

Parisa MoridianFaculty of Engineering, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Navid GhassemiDepartment of Computer Engineering, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran.
Mahboobeh JafariFaculty of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran.
Salam Salloum-AsfarNeurological Disorders Research Center, Qatar Biomedical Research Institute, Hamad Bin Khalifa University, Qatar Foundation, Doha, Qatar.
Delaram SadeghiDepartment of Medical Engineering, Mashhad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran.
Marjane KhodatarsDepartment of Medical Engineering, Mashhad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran.
Afshin ShoeibiData Science and Computational Intelligence Institute, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Abbas KhosraviInstitute for Intelligent Systems Research and Innovation (IISRI), Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
Sai Ho LingFaculty of Engineering and IT, University of Technology Sydney (UTS), Ultimo, NSW, Australia.
Abdulhamit SubasiFaculty of Medicine, Institute of Biomedicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Roohallah AlizadehsaniInstitute for Intelligent Systems Research and Innovation (IISRI), Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
Juan M GorrizData Science and Computational Intelligence Institute, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Sara A AbdullaNeurological Disorders Research Center, Qatar Biomedical Research Institute, Hamad Bin Khalifa University, Qatar Foundation, Doha, Qatar.
U Rajendra AcharyaNgee Ann Polytechnic, Singapore, Singapore.
Deakin University · AUIslamic Azad University, Mashhad · IRUniversidad de Granada · ESFerdowsi University of Mashhad · IRHamad bin Khalifa University · QAIslamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch · IRQatar Foundation · QASemnan University · IRSingapore University of Social Sciences · SGUniversity of Technology Sydney · AUUniversity of Turku · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a brain condition characterized by diverse signs and symptoms that appear in early childhood. ASD is also associated with communication deficits and repetitive behavior in affected individuals. Various ASD detection methods have been developed, including neuroimaging modalities and psychological tests. Among these methods, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) imaging modalities are of paramount importance to physicians. Clinicians rely on MRI modalities to diagnose ASD accurately. The MRI modalities are non-invasive methods that include functional (fMRI) and structural (sMRI) neuroimaging methods. However, diagnosing ASD with fMRI and sMRI for specialists is often laborious and time-consuming; therefore, several computer-aided design systems (CADS) based on artificial intelligence (AI) have been developed to assist specialist physicians. Conventional machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) are the most popular schemes of AI used for diagnosing ASD. This study aims to review the automated detection of ASD using AI. We review several CADS that have been developed using ML techniques for the automated diagnosis of ASD using MRI modalities. There has been very limited work on the use of DL techniques to develop automated diagnostic models for ASD. A summary of the studies developed using DL is provided in the Supplementary Appendix. Then, the challenges encountered during the automated diagnosis of ASD using MRI and AI techniques are described in detail. Additionally, a graphical comparison of studies using ML and DL to diagnose ASD automatically is discussed. We suggest future approaches to detecting ASDs using AI techniques and MRI neuroimaging.

Indexed as

ASD diagnosisdeep learningmachine learningMRI modalitiesneuroimaging

Identifiers

PMID36267703
PMCPMC9577321
OpenAlexW4301398787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.