Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36267533›Full record

ArticleThe Saudi dental journal2022

Compressive strength of premolars restored with ceramic crowns and supported with a glass fiber post using different luting agents.

Flávia Carvalho de Oliveira Paixão, Vandilson Pinheiro Rodrigues, Roy George, Soraia de Fátima Carvalho Souza, Antonio Ernandes Macêdo Paiva, Adriana de Fátima Vasconcelos Pereira

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The Saudi dental journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Flávia Carvalho de Oliveira PaixãoDentistry Graduate Program, Federal University of Maranhão, São Luís, Brazil.
Vandilson Pinheiro RodriguesDentistry Graduate Program, Federal University of Maranhão, São Luís, Brazil.
Roy GeorgeSchool of Dentistry and Oral Health, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia.
Soraia de Fátima Carvalho SouzaDentistry Graduate Program, Federal University of Maranhão, São Luís, Brazil.
Antonio Ernandes Macêdo PaivaDepartment of Mechanic and Materials, Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology of Maranhão, São Luís, Brazil.
Adriana de Fátima Vasconcelos PereiraDentistry Graduate Program, Federal University of Maranhão, São Luís, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The retention of glass fiber post (GFP) is considered a key factor for the long-term success of restorations of endodontically treated teeth. This study aimed to compare the compressive strength of a ceramic crown supported by a GFP using different luting agents. Methods: Forty single-rooted premolars were randomly divided into four groups (n = 10 each): control group (teeth without a GFP), Ketac Cem group (glass ionomer), RelyX ARC group (conventional dual-curing resin), and RelyX U200 group (self-adhesive dual-curing resin). After luting of the posts and placement of all-ceramic crowns made using feldspathic porcelain (Noritake EX-3), they were exposed to thermocycling for 1000 cycles and compressive strength tests. Statistical analysis included Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn's multi-comparison test. Results: The Ketac Cem group and RelyX U200 group showed significantly greater fracture resistance to compressive loading than the control group. Conclusion: This study indicates a possible role of the luting agent used with the GFP in influencing the compressive strength of the restored teeth. In this study, the self-adhesive dual-curing resin and glass ionomer both offered resistance to fractures.

Indexed as

EndodonticsFiber postGFP, glass fiber postGlass ionomerN, newtonsPTFE, polytetrafluoroethyleneR2, coefficient of determinationResinRoot canalβ, coefficient of regression

Identifiers

PMID36267533
PMCPMC9577347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.