ArticleThe Saudi dental journal2022
Stress analysis and factor of safety in three dental implant systems by finite element analysis.
Article in The Saudi dental journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative evaluation of screw loosening and joint integrity across different implant-abutment connection types utilizing stock and CAD/CAM abutments under cyclic loading.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Article
- Zirconia abutments and reduced crown-to-implant ratios: Insights into stress distribution.Brazilian oral research · 2026Article
- Biomechanical Effects of Platform Diameter and Screw Length in an Abutment-Free Tissue-Level Implant System Compared with a Ti-Base Configuration: 3D Finite Element Analysis.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Article
- Biomechanical Influence of Different Cervical Micro-Thread Forms over Narrow-Diameter Implants (2.9 mm) Using Finite Element Analysis.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Article
- Effect of Crestal Position on Bone-Implant Stress Interface of Three-Implant Splinted Prostheses: A Finite Element Analysis.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Comparison of residual stress distribution between root-analogue implant and threaded cylindrical implant.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Influence of different polymeric materials of implant and attachment on stress distribution in implant-supported overdentures: a three-dimensional finite element study.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Article
- Finite element analysis of the treatment of a minimally invasive approach combined with a novel anatomical locking plate for scapular body fractures.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2024Article
- Biomechanical Effects of Ti-Base Abutment Height on the Dental Implant System: A Finite Element Analysis.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2024Article
- Review
- Finite element analysis (FEA) of stress distribution in platform-switched short dental implants.Bioinformation · 2024Article
- Comparative Evaluation of the Effect of Implant Crown Materials on Implant Components and Bone Stress Distribution: A 3D Finite Element Analysis.International journal of dentistry · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the stress distribution and the factor of safety of three dental implant systems using the finite element method. Materials and methods: Three commercial dental implant systems were designed using Solid Works 2020 software: Model A with an internal octagonal connection and matching platform, Model B with an internal hexagon connection and switching platform, and Model C with an internal 15° conical-cylindrical connection and switching platform. A 200 N load was applied to each design in both axial and 30° oblique directions using the finite element method. Results: In the three dental implant systems, the maximum von Mises stress was concentrated at the cervical level of the bone-implant interface in all models. Model C showed lower maximum stress values in both axial and 30° oblique loads. The highest maximum stress value was observed with the application of the oblique load in all the study models, and the factor of safety was less than one in Model A when subjected to a 200 N oblique load. Conclusion: The switching platform models generated lower maximum stress values and a factor of safety higher than one which is considered an acceptable value.Clinical relevance: A dental implant system with an internal hexagon or conical connection and a switching platform generates lower maximum von Mises stress values both on the implant components and on the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.