ArticleMedical journal, Armed Forces India2022
Risk factors for cardiovascular disease in a healthy young population: Family matters.
Article in Medical journal, Armed Forces India, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Benefits of Cilostazol's Effect on Vascular and Neuropathic Complications Caused by Diabetes.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Age-specific differences in the association between prediabetes and cardiovascular diseases in China: A national cross-sectional study.World journal of diabetes · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: India faces an epidemic of cardiovascular disease (CVD). This study sought the effect of family history of CVD and/or its risk factors (CVD-risk) on the presence of risk factors for CVD, in a healthy young college population. Methods: Blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), anthropometric variables, fasting blood sugar and lipid fractions were measured in two hundred healthy individuals (163 men and 37 women), aged 17-22 years. Data were analysed to elicit effect of CVD-risk on measured parameters. Results: All but one subject, had family history of a CVD-risk. Men with family history of coronary heart disease had higher diastolic BP (79.24 ± 7.7 vs 75.99 ± 7.49 mmHg, p = 0.007) and triglycerides (118.66 ± 57.98 vs 85.82 ± 50.89 mg/dL, p < 0.0001) compared with those without similar family history. Men with family history of hypertension (HTN) had higher diastolic BP (78.75 ± 7.15 vs 75.84 ± 8.37 mmHg, p = 0.019) and low-density lipoprotein (86.24 ± 25.38 vs 78.21 ± 17.93 mg/dL, p = 0.019), as well as lower high-density lipoprotein (50.27 ± 8.4 vs 53.96 ± 10.38 mg/dL, p = 0.019). Women with family history of diabetes mellitus had lower high-density lipoproteins (49.89 ± 8.05 vs 59.53 ± 11.44, p = 0.006). Family history of dyslipidaemia was associated with significantly higher triglycerides (146.14 ± 46.19 vs 98.44 ± 56.19 mg/dL, p = 0.002) in men and in subjects across sex. HDL was contrarily higher, in women with family history of cerebrovascular accident/HTN and men with family history of coronary heart disease/HTN. The proportion of pre-HTN, overweight/obese, impaired fasting glucose and borderline high triglycerides was 88.3%, 36.8%, 11% and 38.7% in men and 64.9%, 37.8%, 18.9% and 48.7% in female subjects. Conclusion: Young adults with a family history of CVD-risk already have an incomplete/atypical CVD risk profile.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.