ArticleMedical journal, Armed Forces India2022
Implantable loop recorder in unexplained palpitations or syncope: A randomised study among young patients with structurally normal heart.
Article in Medical journal, Armed Forces India, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The utility of an implantable loop recorder (ILR) in the evaluation of unexplained syncope or palpitations in young patients in the absence of structural heart disease or ventricular dysfunction is limited. To compare the diagnostic yield of ILR with conventional extended Holter evaluation in the detection of arrhythmias among young patients with a structurally normal heart presenting with unexplained palpitations or syncope. Methods: Open-label randomised control trial was conducted in a tertiary cardiac care centre among young patients with recurrent unexplained palpitations (≥3 episodes/year) or syncope (≥2 episodes) with normal electrocardiogram and echocardiography, after excluding non-cardiac causes. Patients were block randomised to either ILR implantation or conventional extended Holter monitoring. Results: Fourteen patients in the ILR group and 16 patients in the conventional group completed the study. The mean age of the patients was 31.9 ± 5.5 and 31.2 ± 5.4 years. Males constituted 78.5% and 75% in the two groups, respectively. Diagnosis was established in 10 (71.5%) patients in the ILR group as compared to only 3 (18.7%) in the conventional group (p = 0.01), with an RR of 0.26 (95% CI 0.089-0.76, p = 0.01). The arrhythmias diagnosed with ILR were narrow complex tachycardia (30%), atrial fibrillation (20%), VPCs (20%), severe bradycardia with asystole due to sinus arrest (10%), VPCs with bigeminy (10%), and ventricular tachycardia (10%). Conclusion: In young patients with unexplained syncope or palpitations, ILR has a higher diagnostic yield in the accurate detection of arrhythmia compared with conventional Holter strategy, resulting in better management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.