Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36267429›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational allergy2022

Machine learning in the diagnosis of asthma phenotypes during coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.

Agnieszka Gawlewicz-Mroczka, Adam Pytlewski, Natalia Celejewska-Wójcik, Adam Ćmiel, Anna Gielicz, Marek Sanak, Lucyna Mastalerz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational allergy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Agnieszka Gawlewicz-MroczkaDepartment of Internal Medicine Jagiellonian University Medical College Krakow Poland.
Adam PytlewskiUniversity Hospital Krakow Poland.
Natalia Celejewska-WójcikDepartment of Internal Medicine Jagiellonian University Medical College Krakow Poland.
Adam ĆmielDepartment of Applied Mathematics AGH University of Science and Technology Krakow Poland.
Anna GieliczDepartment of Internal Medicine Jagiellonian University Medical College Krakow Poland.
Marek SanakDepartment of Internal Medicine Jagiellonian University Medical College Krakow Poland.
Lucyna MastalerzDepartment of Internal Medicine Jagiellonian University Medical College Krakow Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8994-0036
Jagiellonian University · PLAGH University of Krakow · PLKrakow Cardiovascular Research Institute · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, it has become a pressing need to be able to diagnose aspirin hypersensitivity in patients with asthma without the need to use oral aspirin challenge (OAC) testing. OAC is time consuming and is associated with the risk of severe hypersensitive reactions. In this study, we sought to investigate whether machine learning (ML) based on some clinical and laboratory procedures performed during the pandemic might be used for discriminating between patients with aspirin hypersensitivity and those with aspirin-tolerant asthma. Methods: We used a prospective database of 135 patients with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-exacerbated respiratory disease (NERD) and 81 NSAID-tolerant (NTA) patients with asthma who underwent OAC. Clinical characteristics, inflammatory phenotypes based on sputum cells, as well as eicosanoid levels in induced sputum supernatant and urine were extracted for the purpose of applying ML techniques. Results: The overall best ML model, neural network (NN), trained on a set of best features, achieved a sensitivity of 95% and a specificity of 76% for diagnosing NERD. The 3 promising models (i.e., multiple logistic regression, support vector machine, and NN) trained on a set of easy-to-obtain features including only clinical characteristics and laboratory data achieved a sensitivity of 97% and a specificity of 67%. Conclusions: ML techniques are becoming a promising tool for discriminating between patients with NERD and NTA. The models are easy to use, safe, and achieve very good results, which is particularly important during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Indexed as

COVID‐19 pandemicmachine learningnonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drug (NSAID)–exacerbated respiratory disease (NERD)nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drug tolerant asthma (NTA)oral aspirin challenge

Identifiers

PMID36267429
PMCPMC9579891
OpenAlexW4306778042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.