ArticleArthroplasty today2022
Augmenting Pathologic Acetabular Bone Loss With Photodynamic Nails to Support Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Article in Arthroplasty today, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The arc-technique using a photodynamic nail in a dysmorphic fragility fracture of the posterior pelvic ring - a technical note & case report.Trauma case reports · 2026Article
- Quadrilateral surface plating combined with anti-protrusio cage for pelvic discontinuity-a preliminary clinical comparison of a novel technique.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2025Article
- Comparison of Percutaneous Techniques for Stabilization of Osteolytic Lesions of the Periacetabular Region Due to Metastatic Bone Disease.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Review
- Peri-operative outcomes of IlluminOss fixation for pelvic metastatic bone disease.Journal of orthopaedics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pathologic acetabular defects can undermine the stability and osseointegration of a primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) acetabular component. Our service has used photodynamic nails (PDNs) in a modified Harrington technique to provide space-filling stability to a primary acetabular implant without impeding local osseointegration. Here we describe our experience with PDN-augmented THAs. Methods: An institutional review board-approved retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent PDN-augmented THA in the management of severe (Harrington class II or III) acetabular defects from September 1, 2020 to May 1, 2021 with at least 6 months of follow-up was performed. The primary outcome was implant survivorship. Comparisons between preoperative and 6-week postoperative visual analogue pain scores were made using the Mann-Whitney U test. Results: Six patients were included in this case series, 5 with metastatic cancer and 1 with pelvic discontinuity and avascular necrosis following failed attempted acetabular fixation. The mean follow-up duration was 10.3 ± 4.3 months. The mean age was 75.5 ± 4.7 years, mean body mass index 27.3 ± 5.6, and 5 patients were female. All but 1 patient was American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class III. Two patients required acetabular revisions, one for aseptic loosening and a second for a pathologic fracture secondary to disease progression. One patient passed away 90 days after the procedure. The mean visual analogue pain score significantly improved from 7.8 ± 1.6 to 2.0 ± 1.4 six weeks after surgery ( Conclusions: PDN augmentation of the periacetabular bone of patients with large pelvic defects yields durable pain relief and function in vulnerable hosts. PDN should be considered a part of the reconstructive surgeon's armamentarium.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.