Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36267361›Full record

ArticleCities (London, England)2022

Effects of urban form on air quality: A case study from China comparing years with normal and reduced human activity due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Di Wang, Tao Zhou, Jianing Sun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cities (London, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Di WangSchool of Geographical Sciences, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China.
Tao ZhouSchool of Management Science and Real Estate, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China.
Jianing SunSchool of Management Science and Real Estate, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study explored the dynamic and complex relationships between air quality and urban form when considering reduced human activities. Applying the random forest method to data from 62 prefecture-level cities in China, urban form-air quality relationships were compared between 2015 (a normal year) and 2020 (which had significantly reduced air pollution due to COVID-19 lockdowns). Significant differences were found between these two years; urban compactness, shape, and size were of prime importance to air quality in 2020, while fragmentation was the most critical factor in improving air quality in 2015. An important influence of traffic mode was also found when controlling air pollution. In general, in the pursuit of reducing air pollution across society, the best urban forms are continuous and compact with reasonable building layouts, population, and road densities, and high forest area ratios. A polycentric urban form that alleviates the negative impacts of traffic pollution is preferable. Urban development should aim to reduce air pollution, and optimizing the effects of urban form on air quality is a cost-effective way to create better living environments. This study provides a reference for decision-makers evaluating the effects of urban form on air pollution emission, dispersion, and concentration in the post-pandemic era.

Indexed as

Air qualityChinaCOVID-19Urban form

Identifiers

PMID36267361
PMCPMC9556959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.