ArticleComputational and mathematical methods in medicine2022
Comparative Study on Feature Selection in Protein Structure and Function Prediction.
Article in Computational and mathematical methods in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Identification of exosomal miRNA-based predictive signatures for gestational diabetes mellitus via multi-algorithm machine learning.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Many effective methods extract and fuse different protein features to study the relationship between protein sequence, structure, and function, but different methods have preferences in solving the research of protein structure and function, which requires selecting valuable and contributing features to design more effective prediction methods. This work mainly focused on the feature selection methods in the study of protein structure and function, and systematically compared and analyzed the efficiency of different feature selection methods in the prediction of protein structures, protein disorders, protein molecular chaperones, and protein solubility. The results show that the feature selection method based on nonlinear SVM performs best in protein structure prediction, protein solubility prediction, protein molecular chaperone prediction, and protein solubility prediction. After selection, the accuracy of features is improved by 13.16% ~71%, especially the Kmer features and PSSM features of proteins.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.