Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36267311›Full record

ArticleComputational and mathematical methods in medicine2022

Construction of a Colorectal Cancer Prognostic Risk Model and Screening of Prognostic Risk Genes Using Machine-Learning Algorithms.

Xuezhi Du, Han Qi, Wenbin Ji, Peiyuan Li, Run Hua, Wenliang Hu, Feng Qi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and mathematical methods in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Clusterin Expression in Colorectal Carcinomas.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Xuezhi DuDepartment of General Surgery, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300052, China.
Han QiCollege of Letters and Science, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
Wenbin JiDepartment of General Surgery, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300052, China.
Peiyuan LiDepartment of General Surgery, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300052, China.
Run HuaDepartment of General Surgery, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300052, China.
Wenliang HuDepartment of General Surgery, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300052, China.
Feng QiDepartment of General Surgery, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300052, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5490-0985

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study is aimed at constructing a prognostic risk model for colorectal cancer (CRC) using machine-learning algorithms to provide accurate staging and screening of credible prognostic risk genes. We extracted CRC data from GSE126092 and GSE156355 of the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database and datasets from TCGA to analyze the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) using bioinformatics analysis. Among the 330 shared DEGs related to CRC prognosis, we divided the analysis period into different phases and applied univariate COX regression, LASSO, and multivariate COX regression analysis. GO analysis and KEGG analysis revealed that the functions of these DEGs were primarily focused on cell cycle, DNA replication, cell mitosis, and other related functions, and this confirmed our results from a biological perspective. Finally, a prognostic risk model for CRC based on the CHGA, CLU, PLK1, AXIN2, NR3C2, IL17RB, GCG, and AJUBA genes was constructed, and the risk score enabled us to predict the prognosis for CRC. To obtain a comprehensive and accurate model, we used both internal and external evaluations, and the model was able to correctly differentiate patients with CRC into a high-risk group with poor prognosis and a low-risk group with good prognosis. The AUC values of the 3-, 5-, and 10-year survival ROC curves were 0.715, 0.721, and 0.777, respectively, according to the internal evaluation, and the AUC values were 0.606, 0.698, and 0.608, respectively, for the external evaluation using GSE39582 from the GEO database. We determined that CLU, PLK1, and IL17RB could be considered to be independent prognostic factors for CRC with significantly different expression (

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsProtein Interaction MapsAlgorithmsBiomarkers, TumorDatabases, GeneticEarly Detection of CancerGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMachine LearningPrognosisBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID36267311
PMCPMC9578894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.