Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36267202›Full record

ReviewBJUI compass2022

Pooled outcomes of performing freehand transperineal prostate biopsy with the PrecisionPoint Transperineal Access System.

Michael Tzeng, Spyridon P Basourakos, Hiten D Patel, Matthew J Allaway, Jim C Hu, Michael A Gorin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BJUI compass, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Michael TzengDepartment of Urology Weill Cornell Medicine New York New York USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1384-407X
Spyridon P BasourakosDepartment of Urology Weill Cornell Medicine New York New York USA.
Hiten D PatelDepartment of Urology Loyola University Medical Center Maywood Illinois USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4028-010X
Matthew J AllawayUrology Associates and UPMC Western Maryland Cumberland Maryland USA.
Jim C HuDepartment of Urology Weill Cornell Medicine New York New York USA.
Michael A GorinUrology Associates and UPMC Western Maryland Cumberland Maryland USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8315-6603

Funding

Evaluation of Transperineal Biopsy under Local Anesthesia, a Novel approach to Decrease Post-Biopsy Infections and Improve Cancer DetectionR01CA241758 · NCI · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI ALLAF, MOHAMAD, HU, JIM · 2020 to 2024
$3.1M
Pelvic fascia spARing radical prostatectomy TrIAL (PARTIAL)R01CA259173 · NCI · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI Mohamad Allaf, Jim Hu · 2022 to 2026
$3.1M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA241758NCI NIH HHS R01 CA259173
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To report the results of a pooled analysis evaluating the cancer detection rates, complications, and tolerability of prostate biopsies performed using the PrecisionPoint Transperineal Access System. Patients and Methods: The medical literature was reviewed to identify studies published prior to 1 October 2021 evaluating the PrecisionPoint device for performance of transperineal prostate biopsy. Pooled analyses were performed to assess overall and clinically significant cancer detection rates. Additionally, data on complications as well as patient tolerability of the procedure when performed under local anaesthesia were extracted. Results: Transperineal biopsy with the PrecisionPoint Transperineal Access System achieved overall and clinically significant cancer detection rates of 67.9% and 42.6%, respectively. Among patients with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System 3, 4, and 5 lesions on prostate magnetic resonance imaging, clinically significant disease was found in 31.7%, 55.7%, and 71.8% of patients, respectively. Complications were rare, with sepsis reported in 4 (0.1%) of 3411 procedures despite frequent omission of antibiotic prophylaxis. Patients reported acceptable tolerability of the procedure when performed under local anaesthesia. Conclusions: Within the available medical literature, there is uniform evidence supporting the use of the PrecisionPoint Transperineal Access System for performing prostate biopsy procedures. The reported cancer detection and infectious complication rates with this device are in line with other methods for performing transperineal prostate biopsy. A unique aspect of the PrecisionPoint device is its ability to facilitate performing transperineal prostate biopsy under local anaesthesia. This factor will likely lead to increased adoption of the beneficial transperineal approach to prostate biopsy.

Indexed as

biopsydiagnostic techniquesPrecisionPointprostatic neoplasmssepsissurgicaltransperineal

Identifiers

PMID36267202
PMCPMC9579885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.