Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36267201›Full record

ArticleBJUI compass2022

Selecting patients for magnetic resonance imaging cognitive versus ultrasound fusion biopsy of the prostate: A within-patient comparison.

Mitch Hayes, Solange Bassale, Nicholas H Chakiryan, Luc Boileau, Jacob Grassauer, Matthew Wagner, Bryan Foster, Fergus Coakley, Sudhir Isharwal, Christopher L Amling and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJUI compass, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Mitch HayesDepartment of Urology Oregon Health & Science University Portland Oregon USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3240-9946
Solange BassaleKnight Cancer Institute, Biostatistics Shared Resources Oregon Health and Science University Portland Oregon USA.
Nicholas H ChakiryanDepartment of Urology Oregon Health & Science University Portland Oregon USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9263-8957
Luc BoileauDepartment of Urology Oregon Health & Science University Portland Oregon USA.
Jacob GrassauerDepartment of Urology Oregon Health & Science University Portland Oregon USA.
Matthew WagnerDepartment of Urology Kaiser Permanente Portland Oregon USA.
Bryan FosterDepartment of Radiology Oregon Health and Science University Portland Oregon USA.
Fergus CoakleyDepartment of Radiology Oregon Health and Science University Portland Oregon USA.
Sudhir IsharwalDepartment of Urology Oregon Health & Science University Portland Oregon USA.
Christopher L AmlingDepartment of Urology Oregon Health & Science University Portland Oregon USA.
Jen-Jane LiuDepartment of Urology Oregon Health & Science University Portland Oregon USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To compare overall agreement between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-ultrasound (US) fusion biopsy (FB) and MRI cognitive fusion biopsy (CB) of the prostate and determine which factors affect agreement for prostate cancer (PCa) who underwent both modalities in a prospective within-patient protocol. Patients and Methods: From August 2017 to January 2021, patients with at least one Prostate Imaging Reporting & Data System (PI-RADS) 3 or higher lesion on multiparametric MRI underwent transrectal FB and CB in a prospective within-patient protocol. CB was performed for each region of interest (ROI), followed by FB, followed by standard 12 core biopsy. Patients who were not on active surveillance were analysed. The primary endpoint was agreement for any PCa detection. McNemar's test and kappa statistic were used to analyse agreement. Chi-square test, Fisher's exact test and Wilcoxon rank sum test were used to analyse disagreement across clinical and MRI spatial variables. A multivariable generalized mixed-effect model was used to compare the interaction between select variables and fusion modality. Statistics were performed using SAS and R. Results: Ninety patients and 98 lesions were included in the analysis. There was moderate agreement between FB and CB ( Conclusion: In a within-patient protocol of patients not on active surveillance, FB and CB performed similarly for PCa detection and with moderate agreement. Anterior location was associated with significantly higher disagreement, whereas other patient and lesion characteristics were not. Additional studies are needed to determine optimal biopsy technique for sampling anterior ROI.

Indexed as

biopsydiagnosismagnetic resonance imagingprostate cancer

Identifiers

PMID36267201
PMCPMC9579877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.