ArticleCase reports in dentistry2022
Severe, Treatment-Refractory Periodontitis and Vitamin D Deficiency: A Multidisciplinary Case Report.
Article in Case reports in dentistry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Vitamin D deficiency and periodontitis are common diseases among people. These conditions interact with each other and worsen the patient's health. Modern dentistry aims to rehabilitate oral health and bring it back to the original state or even improve aesthetics. Without analysing the general health conditions of patients and without a multidisciplinary approach, it is sometimes not possible to solve a case such as we describe. This study shows how a vitamin D deficit can influence the choice of dental treatment. The patient, a 40-year-old woman, in generally good health, came to our observation complaining about pain during mastication, and profuse bleeding during home hygiene maneuvers. She wished to solve this situation. Materials and Methods: Since the patient did not respond well to the initial periodontal therapy, we carried out some accurate research concerning the patient's previous clinical history, and as we suspected that a vitamin D deficit might be involved, a chemical test for vitamin D was carried out and the results confirmed our suspicions. The team programmed the following therapeutical plan: Phase 1-rehabilitation of normal values of vitamin D with the support of an endocrinologist; Phase 2-full mouth disinfection; Phase 3-periodontal surgical restorative therapy; and Phase 4-orthodontic therapy and fixed prosthetics rehabilitation. Results: The results for this clinical case were extremely satisfying; we were able to bring the periodontal illness under control; resolve the orthodontic problems; and rehabilitate the patient both functionally and aesthetically. Conclusion: Thanks to the collaboration and communication between specialists from different sectors of medicine and dentistry, the clinical case was solved with absolutely satisfactory results.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.