Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36266761›Full record

ArticleNursing open2023

Use of infographics for facilitating learning of pharmacology in the nursing degree.

Alfonso Meneses-Monroy, Ana B Rivas-Paterna, Elena Orgaz-Rivas, Francisco J García-González, María J González-Sanavia, Guillermo Moreno, Enrique Pacheco

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alfonso Meneses-MonroyNursing Department, Faculty of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Podiatry, Universidad Complutense de Madrid (Complutense University of Madrid), Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0486-3164
Ana B Rivas-PaternaNursing Department, Faculty of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Podiatry, Universidad Complutense de Madrid (Complutense University of Madrid), Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5357-4583
Elena Orgaz-RivasNursing Department, Faculty of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Podiatry, Universidad Complutense de Madrid (Complutense University of Madrid), Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1265-4426
Francisco J García-GonzálezNursing Department, Faculty of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Podiatry, Universidad Complutense de Madrid (Complutense University of Madrid), Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9078-4416
María J González-SanaviaNursing Department, Faculty of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Podiatry, Universidad Complutense de Madrid (Complutense University of Madrid), Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1114-4096
Guillermo MorenoNursing Department, Faculty of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Podiatry, Universidad Complutense de Madrid (Complutense University of Madrid), Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2873-3874
Enrique PachecoNursing Department, Faculty of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Podiatry, Universidad Complutense de Madrid (Complutense University of Madrid), Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0350-2044

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo evaluate the impact of an educational intervention focused on teaching students to create infographics to improve pharmacology learning.

designThis is a comparative study.

methodsThe population was 250 nursing students who had to create two infographics in groups related to the content that had been addressed in pharmacology in two different moments. Students and professors evaluated the infographics through a 5-point Likert scale. Scores from the official exam of the pharmacology subject were obtained.

resultsMost of the students scored below 50% for the "excellent" and "good" categories. Intraclass correlation and kappa correlations among students and professors' evaluations were low. The comparison between both times of students' evaluations only yields significant correlation values for the criterion "Understanding of information" (r = .039, p = .024) and the "Visual presentation of information" (r = .041, p = .019). No correlation was obtained between the test and evaluations values of the infographic.

Indexed as

Data VisualizationStudents, NursingCurriculumEducational MeasurementHumansLearninginfographicsnursing degreeteaching methodology

Identifiers

PMID36266761
PMCPMC9912395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.