Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36266681›Full record

Observational studyBMC public health2022

Evaluation of two social norms nudge interventions to promote healthier food choices in a Canadian grocery store.

Selina Suleman, Molly Sweeney-Magee, Susan Pinkney, Kimberly Charbonneau, Kelly Banh, Ilona Hale, Shazhan Amed

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Selina SulemanBritish Columbia Children's Hospital Research Institute, 4480 Oak Street, Vancouver, BC, V6H 3V4, Canada.
Molly Sweeney-MageeBritish Columbia Children's Hospital Research Institute, 4480 Oak Street, Vancouver, BC, V6H 3V4, Canada.
Susan PinkneyBritish Columbia Children's Hospital Research Institute, 4480 Oak Street, Vancouver, BC, V6H 3V4, Canada.
Kimberly CharbonneauBritish Columbia Children's Hospital Research Institute, 4480 Oak Street, Vancouver, BC, V6H 3V4, Canada.
Kelly BanhBritish Columbia Children's Hospital Research Institute, 4480 Oak Street, Vancouver, BC, V6H 3V4, Canada.
Ilona HaleDepartment of Family Practice, 3rd Floor David Strangway Building, 5950 University Boulevard, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada.
Shazhan AmedBritish Columbia Children's Hospital Research Institute, 4480 Oak Street, Vancouver, BC, V6H 3V4, Canada. SAmed@cw.bc.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine the impact of two nudge interventions on customers' produce purchases at a rural Canadian grocery store. A pre- and post-intervention observational study design was used. Sales data were gathered before and after the staggered implementation of two nudge-based interventions to encourage produce purchases: grocery cart dividers to encourage shoppers to fill one-third of their cart with produce and grocery cart plaques with information about how many fruits and vegetables were typically purchased in the store. The proportion of total sales accounted for by produce was compared between baseline and implementation of the first intervention (Phase 1), between implementation of the first intervention and the addition of the second intervention (Phase 2), and between baseline and post-implementation of both interventions together. There was a 5% relative increase (0.5% absolute increase) in produce spending between baseline and post-implementation of both interventions (10.3% to 10.8%, p < 0.001, 95% CI 0.2%, 0.7%). Intervention phase-specific produce spending showed no significant change in the percentage of produce spending from baseline to Phase 1 of the intervention, and an 8% relative increase (0.8% absolute increase) in the percentage of produce spending from Phase 1 to Phase 2 of the intervention (10.3% to 11.1%, p < 0.001, 95% CI 0.5, 1.1%). Simple, low-cost nudge interventions were effective at increasing the proportion of total grocery spend on produce. This study also demonstrated that partnerships with local businesses can promote healthier food choices in rural communities in Canada.

Indexed as

Food MarketsSocial NormsCanadaChoice BehaviorHealth PromotionHumansBehaviour changeFood choiceHealthy eatingNudge interventions

Identifiers

PMID36266681
PMCPMC9583495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.