ArticleBMC genomics2022
Construction and analysis of sample-specific driver modules for breast cancer.
Article in BMC genomics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Single-Sample Networks Reveal Intra-Cytoband Co-Expression Hotspots in Breast Cancer Subtypes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIt is important to understand the functional impact of somatic mutation and methylation aberration at an individual level to implement precision medicine. Recent studies have demonstrated that the perturbation of gene interaction networks can provide a fundamental link between genotype (or epigenotype) and phenotype. However, it is unclear how individual mutations affect the function of biological networks, especially for individual methylation aberration. To solve this, we provided a sample-specific driver module construction method using the 2-order network theory and hub-gene theory to identify individual perturbation networks driven by mutations or methylation aberrations.
resultsOur method integrated multi-omics of breast cancer, including genomics, transcriptomics, epigenomics and interactomics, and provided new insight into the synergistic collaboration between methylation and mutation at an individual level. A common driver pattern of breast cancer was identified from a novel perspective of a driver module, which is correlated to the occurrence and development of breast cancer. The constructed driver module reflects the survival prognosis and degree of malignancy among different subtypes of breast cancer. Additionally, subtype-specific driver modules were identified.
conclusionsThis study explores the driver module of individual cancer, and contributes to a better understanding of the mechanism of breast cancer driven by the mutations and methylation variations from the point of view of the driver network. This work will help identify new therapeutic combinations of gene mutations and drugs in humans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.