Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36266634›Full record

ArticleBMC microbiology2022

Evaluation of diagnostic performance of H-based blocking ELISA for specific detection of peste des petits ruminants in domestic sheep, goats, cattle and camels.

Kumela Lelisa, Tesfaye Rufael Chibssa, Fanta Desissa, Kemal Emiyu, Ayelech Muluneh, Demeke Sibhatu Lobago, Dereje Shegu Gebreweld, Kebede Debebe, Abde Aliy Mohammed

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kumela LelisaAnimal Health Institute, P.O Box 04, Sebeta, Oromia, Ethiopia. lelisakumela@gmail.com.
Tesfaye Rufael ChibssaAnimal Health Institute, P.O Box 04, Sebeta, Oromia, Ethiopia.
Fanta DesissaCollege of Veterinary Medicine and Agriculture, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Veterinary Public health, Addis Ababa University, P.O. Box, 34, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Kemal EmiyuAnimal Health Institute, P.O Box 04, Sebeta, Oromia, Ethiopia.
Ayelech MulunehAnimal Health Institute, P.O Box 04, Sebeta, Oromia, Ethiopia.
Demeke Sibhatu LobagoAnimal Health Institute, P.O Box 04, Sebeta, Oromia, Ethiopia.
Dereje Shegu GebreweldAnimal Health Institute, P.O Box 04, Sebeta, Oromia, Ethiopia.
Kebede DebebeAnimal Health Institute, P.O Box 04, Sebeta, Oromia, Ethiopia.
Abde Aliy MohammedAnimal Health Institute, P.O Box 04, Sebeta, Oromia, Ethiopia.
Addis Ababa University · ET

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPeste des petits ruminants virus (PPRV) causes a highly devastating disease of sheep and goats, peste des petits ruminants (PPR), which is targeted for global control and eradication by 2030. The serological diagnostic tool kits for accurate diagnosis of PPR have inherent strengths and weaknesses that require parallel validation and optimization across animal species. Thus, the objective of this study was to evaluate diagnostic performance of haemagglutinin based PPR blocking ELISA (HPPR- b-ELISA), that was developed by Africa Union Pan African Veterinary Vaccine Center for specific detection of anti- PPRV antibodies.

methodsIn preliminarily investigation, diagnostic performance of the HPPR-b-ELISA®, commercial PPR competition ELISA (c-ELISA) and virus neutralization test (VNT) were compared for the detection of anti-PPRV antibodies in goats, sheep, cattle and camels.

resultsThe sensitivity and specificity of HPPR- b-ELISA® were 79.55 and 99.74%, respectively, compared to c-ELISA. The HPPR- b-ELISA® was in perfect agreement (κ = 0.86) with the c-ELISA in all sera collected from goats, sheep and cattle. There was almost perfect agreement between the species of goats (κ = 0.82) and sheep (κ = 0.98), while the agreement was substantial in cattle (κ = 0.78) and no agreement was observed in camels (κ = 0.00). Similarly, the sensitivity and specificity of the HPPR b-ELISA were 80 and 96.36%, respectively compared to VNT with almost perfect agreement in goats (κ = 0.83) and sheep (κ = 0.89), moderate in cattle (κ = 0.50) and none in camels (κ = 0.00).

conclusionOur study revealed that HPPR- b-ELISA is a suitable and valid method that can alternatively be used for screening and monitoring of PPR in sheep, goats and cattle except for camels.

Indexed as

Goat DiseasesPeste-des-Petits-RuminantsPeste-des-petits-ruminants virusSheep DiseasesAnimalsAntibodies, ViralCamelusCattleEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayGoatsHemagglutininsRuminantsSheepSheep, DomesticAntibodies, ViralHemagglutininsAntibodiesc-ELISAHPPR- b-ELISAPeste des petits ruminantsRuminantsVNT

Identifiers

PMID36266634
PMCPMC9585824
OpenAlexW4306918814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.