Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36266626›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2022

Multi-objective data enhancement for deep learning-based ultrasound analysis.

Chengkai Piao, Mengyue Lv, Shujie Wang, Rongyan Zhou, Yuchen Wang, Jinmao Wei, Jian Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Chengkai PiaoCollege of Computer Science, Nankai University, Tianjin, China.
Mengyue LvDepartment of Ultrasound, Cangzhou Municipal Haixing Hospital, Cangzhou, China.
Shujie WangDepartment of Ultrasound, Cangzhou Municipal Haixing Hospital, Cangzhou, China.
Rongyan ZhouDepartment of Ultrasound, Cangzhou Municipal Haixing Hospital, Cangzhou, China.
Yuchen WangCollege of Computer Science, Nankai University, Tianjin, China.
Jinmao WeiCollege of Computer Science, Nankai University, Tianjin, China. weijm@nankai.edu.cn.
Jian LiuCollege of Computer Science, Nankai University, Tianjin, China. jianliu@nankai.edu.cn.

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China 2018YFC1603800National Natural Science Foundation of China 61772288Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin City 18JCZDJC30900
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently, Deep Learning based automatic generation of treatment recommendation has been attracting much attention. However, medical datasets are usually small, which may lead to over-fitting and inferior performances of deep learning models. In this paper, we propose multi-objective data enhancement method to indirectly scale up the medical data to avoid over-fitting and generate high quantity treatment recommendations. Specifically, we define a main and several auxiliary tasks on the same dataset and train a specific model for each of these tasks to learn different aspects of knowledge in limited data scale. Meanwhile, a Soft Parameter Sharing method is exploited to share learned knowledge among models. By sharing the knowledge learned by auxiliary tasks to the main task, the proposed method can take different semantic distributions into account during the training process of the main task. We collected an ultrasound dataset of thyroid nodules that contains Findings, Impressions and Treatment Recommendations labeled by professional doctors. We conducted various experiments on the dataset to validate the proposed method and justified its better performance than existing methods.

Indexed as

Deep LearningNeural Networks, ComputerKnowledgeResearch DesignDeep learningMulti-objectiveParameter sharingThyroid nodulesUltrasound analysis

Identifiers

PMID36266626
PMCPMC9583467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.