ArticleScientific reports2022
Evaluation of the microperimetry in eyes with cuticular drusen.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Longitudinal spatial correlation of retinal sensitivity and structural changes in macular telangiectasia type 2.International journal of retina and vitreous · 2026Article
- Spatial Distribution of Cuticular Drusen and its Association with Category-Specific Progression Risk in Intermediate AMD.Research square · 2026Article
- Selective retina therapy for central serous chorioretinopathy with focal choroidal excavation: a retrospective case series of six eyes.International journal of retina and vitreous · 2025Article
- Use of a Fundus Image-Based Titration Strategy for Selective Retina Therapy for Central Serous Chorioretinopathy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Retinal sensitivity may vary by subtypes of cuticular drusen. This retrospective study included 52 eyes of 32 patients with cuticular drusen. All the patients underwent assessment of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), color fundus photography, fluorescein angiography, fundus autofluorescence, and microperimetry. The area occupied by drusen was counted using microperimetry. The cuticular drusen subtype was classified into 3 groups based on the SD-OCT findings. Age, BCVA, pattern standard deviation, area occupied by drusen, pupil size, and the false-positive rate were not significantly different (p > 0.05) according to the cuticular drusen type. The mean retinal sensitivity (MRS) (p = 0.063) and mean deviation (MD) (p = 0.098) showed marginally significant differences among the groups. In the subgroup analyses, type 1 and type 3 cuticular drusen showed significant differences in the MD (- 1.8 ± 2.1 vs - 5.1 ± 5.3; p = 0.011) and MRS (25.1 ± 2.2 vs 21.3 ± 5.7; p = 0.016) without differences in age, BCVA, or the area occupied by drusen (p > 0.05). The results indicate that depending on the subtypes of cuticular drusen type, the deterioration of retinal sensitivity is more likely to occur than decreased vision.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.