ArticleJournal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics2022
Physiologically-based pharmacokinetic model for pulmonary disposition of protein therapeutics in humans.
Article in Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Integrating in vitro aerosol characterization and cross-species PBPK modeling to predict human lung exposure of inhaled therapeutic proteins.International journal of pharmaceutics: X · 2026Article
- Opportunities for machine learning and artificial intelligence in physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2025Review
- Effect of Acute Lung Injury (ALI) Induced by Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) on the Pulmonary Pharmacokinetics of an Antibody.Antibodies (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Development and application of a physiologically-based pharmacokinetic model for ractopamine in goats.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Lung related disorders like COPD and Asthma, as well as various infectious diseases, form a major therapeutic area which would benefit from a predictive and adaptable mathematical model for describing pulmonary disposition of biological modalities. In this study we fill that gap by extending the cross-species two-pore physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) platform with more detailed respiratory tract that includes the airways and alveolar space with epithelial lining fluid. We parameterize the paracellular and FcRn-facilitated exchange pathways between the epithelial lining fluid and lung interstitial space by building a mechanistic model for the exchange between the two. The optimized two-pore PBPK model described pulmonary exposure of several systemically dosed mAbs for which data is available and is also in agreement with the observed levels of endogenous IgG and albumin. The proposed framework can be used to assess pharmacokinetics of new lung-targeting biologic therapies and guide their dosing to achieve desired exposure at the pulmonary site-of-action.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.