Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36266494›Full record

ArticleDocumenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology2023

Modulation of flash ERGs by dynamic backgrounds.

Jan Kremers, Avinash J Aher, Cord Huchzermeyer

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 57% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The interaction between the ERG responses to sinusoidal modulation and flashes in mice.Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jan KremersExperimental Ophthalmology, Section for Retinal Physiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Schwabachanlage 6, 91054, Erlangen, Germany. Jan.kremers@uk-erlangen.de.ORCID 0000-0002-9293-7380
Avinash J AherExperimental Ophthalmology, Section for Retinal Physiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Schwabachanlage 6, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0516-1706
Cord HuchzermeyerExperimental Ophthalmology, Section for Retinal Physiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Schwabachanlage 6, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0408-8981
Universitätsklinikum Erlangen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study was to characterize the signal processing mechanisms that lead to an ERG response and to use this characterization for obtaining more robust responses in patients who display feeble responses with standard recordings. We studied the influence of sinusoidally modulating backgrounds on flash ERGs and the relationship between the ERG components' amplitudes and the momentary Weber fraction of the flash stimulus.

methodsERG recordings were performed in nine healthy subjects and three RP patients. In four normal subjects, we measured the response to flashes (500 cd/m

resultsThe flash ERGs were strongly modulated by the backgrounds particularly at low frequencies and were enhanced when the momentary Weber fraction was large. The amplitudes of the components could be described by the Weber fraction plus a saturating nonlinearity and a delay in the processing of background luminance. The strength of the modulation decreased with increasing peak time of the component. Furthermore the background luminance delay was positively correlated with the peak time. The effect was also present in RP patients.

conclusionsA sine wave background of about 1 Hz can be used to enhance ERG responses. Weber fraction of the flashes is an adequate quantification of stimulus for describing the amplitudes of the ERGs. The data provide basic information on how background luminance is processed in ERG generating mechanisms. The response enhancement can be used in clinical applications to obtain a more robust comparison between normal and patient data.

Indexed as

ElectroretinographyRetinal DiseasesHealthy VolunteersHumansPhotic StimulationElectroretinogramHumanPulse stimuliSine waveWeber fraction

Identifiers

PMID36266494
PMCPMC9911495
OpenAlexW4306950829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.