Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36266476›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nutrition2023

Adherence to the EAT-Lancet sustainable reference diet and cardiometabolic risk profile: cross-sectional results from the ELSA-Brasil cohort study.

Leandro Teixeira Cacau, Isabela Martins Benseñor, Alessandra Carvalho Goulart, Leticia de Oliveira Cardoso, Itamar de Souza Santos, Paulo Andrade Lotufo, Luis A Moreno, Dirce Maria Marchioni

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nutrition, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Leandro Teixeira CacauDepartment of Nutrition, School of Public Health, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, 01246-904, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1681-5960
Isabela Martins BenseñorClinical and Epidemiological Research Center, University Hospital, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, 05508-000, Brazil.
Alessandra Carvalho GoulartClinical and Epidemiological Research Center, University Hospital, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, 05508-000, Brazil.
Leticia de Oliveira CardosoNational School of Public Health, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, 21041-210, Brazil.
Itamar de Souza SantosClinical and Epidemiological Research Center, University Hospital, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, 05508-000, Brazil.
Paulo Andrade LotufoClinical and Epidemiological Research Center, University Hospital, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, 05508-000, Brazil.
Luis A MorenoGrowth, Exercise, Nutrition and Development (GENUD) Research Group, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Zaragoza, 50009, Zaragoza, Spain.
Dirce Maria MarchioniDepartment of Nutrition, School of Public Health, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, 01246-904, Brazil. marchioni@usp.br.

Funding

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2019/13424-0Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2020/12326-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe EAT-Lancet Commission released a reference sustainable diet to improve human health and respect the planetary boundaries. The Planetary Health Diet Index (PHDI) was developed with the purpose of evaluate the adherence to this reference diet. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the association between adherence to the EAT-Lancet diet with cardiometabolic risk profile.

methodsWe used the cross-sectional baseline data from 14,155 participants of the Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Adult Health (ELSA-Brasil), a multicenter ongoing cohort study. Dietary data were collected using a 114-item validated food frequency questionnaire. The PHDI was used to assess the adherence to the EAT-Lancet diet. It consists of 16 components and the total score can range from 0 to 150 points. Linear, logistic and quasi-Poisson regression models were built to evaluate the associations between PHDI and the outcomes.

resultsIndividuals with higher adherence to EAT-Lancet diet (PHDI, 5th quintile) had lower values for systolic blood pressure (β - 0.84; 95% CI - 1.66: - 0.01), diastolic blood pressure (β - 0.70; 95% CI - 1.24: - 0.15), total cholesterol (β - 3.15; 95% CI - 5.30: - 1.01), LDL-c (β - 4.10; 95% CI - 5.97: -  2.23), and non-HDL-cholesterol (β - 2.57; 95% CI - 4.62: - 0.52). No association was observed for HDL-c, triglycerides and HOMA-IR.

conclusionsOur results indicate that higher adherence to the EAT-Lancet diet is associated with lower levels of blood pressure, total cholesterol, LDL-c, and non-HDL-c.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesDietAdultBrazilCholesterolCohort StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesHumansLongitudinal StudiesRisk FactorsCholesterolBlood pressureCardiovascular diseasesDiet indexesEAT-Lancet dietLipid profileSustainable diet

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.