Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36266455›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

A comprehensive evaluation of polygenic score and genotype imputation performances of human SNP arrays in diverse populations.

Dat Thanh Nguyen, Trang T H Tran, Mai Hoang Tran, Khai Tran, Duy Pham, Nguyen Thuy Duong, Quan Nguyen, Nam S Vo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Dat Thanh NguyenCenter for Biomedical Informatics, Vingroup Big Data Institute, Hanoi, Vietnam. n.dat@outlook.com.ORCID 0000-0003-3852-9578
Trang T H TranCenter for Biomedical Informatics, Vingroup Big Data Institute, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Mai Hoang TranCenter for Biomedical Informatics, Vingroup Big Data Institute, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Khai TranCenter for Biomedical Informatics, Vingroup Big Data Institute, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Duy PhamInstitute for Molecular Bioscience, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Nguyen Thuy DuongCenter for Biomedical Informatics, Vingroup Big Data Institute, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Quan NguyenInstitute for Molecular Bioscience, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia. quan.nguyen@imb.uq.edu.au.
Nam S VoCenter for Biomedical Informatics, Vingroup Big Data Institute, Hanoi, Vietnam. v.namvs@vinbigdata.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Regardless of the overwhelming use of next-generation sequencing technologies, microarray-based genotyping combined with the imputation of untyped variants remains a cost-effective means to interrogate genetic variations across the human genome. This technology is widely used in genome-wide association studies (GWAS) at bio-bank scales, and more recently, in polygenic score (PGS) analysis to predict and stratify disease risk. Over the last decade, human genotyping arrays have undergone a tremendous growth in both number and content making a comprehensive evaluation of their performances became more important. Here, we performed a comprehensive performance assessment for 23 available human genotyping arrays in 6 ancestry groups using diverse public and in-house datasets. The analyses focus on performance estimation of derived imputation (in terms of accuracy and coverage) and PGS (in terms of concordance to PGS estimated from whole-genome sequencing data) in three different traits and diseases. We found that the arrays with a higher number of SNPs are not necessarily the ones with higher imputation performance, but the arrays that are well-optimized for the targeted population could provide very good imputation performance. In addition, PGS estimated by imputed SNP array data is highly correlated to PGS estimated by whole-genome sequencing data in most cases. When optimal arrays are used, the correlations of PGS between two types of data are higher than 0.97, but interestingly, arrays with high density can result in lower PGS performance. Our results suggest the importance of properly selecting a suitable genotyping array for PGS applications. Finally, we developed a web tool that provides interactive analyses of tag SNP contents and imputation performance based on population and genomic regions of interest. This study would act as a practical guide for researchers to design their genotyping arrays-based studies. The tool is available at: https://genome.vinbigdata.org/tools/saa/ .

Indexed as

Genome, HumanGenome-Wide Association StudyGenotypeHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansPolymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Identifiers

PMID36266455
PMCPMC9585077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.