ArticleScientific reports2022
A comprehensive evaluation of polygenic score and genotype imputation performances of human SNP arrays in diverse populations.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Selphi, a tool for improving genotype imputation accuracy.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Distinct Genetic Profiles Associated With Subretinal Drusenoid Deposits and Cardiovascular Risk in Age-Related Macular Degeneration.Translational vision science & technology · 2026Article
- Clinical use of polygenic risk scores: current status, barriers and future directions.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026Review
- Genomic platform specific polygenic risk scores impact breast cancer risk stratification.Communications medicine · 2025Article
- The Influence of CYP2B6, GSTP1, and SLCO1B1 Star Allele-Predicted Phenotypes and CBR1 Genetic Variants on Effectiveness Outcomes in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma Receiving Doxorubicin via Transarterial Chemoembolization.Pharmacology research & perspectives · 2025Observational
- Bridging genomics' greatest challenge: The diversity gap.Cell genomics · 2025Review
- Adult Onset Foveomacular Vitelliform Dystrophy Shows Genetic Overlap With Age-Related Macular Degeneration.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2024Article
- Commonly used genomic arrays may lose information due to imperfect coverage of discovered variants for autism spectrum disorder.Journal of neurodevelopmental disorders · 2024Article
- Recent advances in polygenic scores: translation, equitability, methods and FAIR tools.Genome medicine · 2024Review
- The predictive capacity of polygenic risk scores for disease risk is only moderately influenced by imputation panels tailored to the target population.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- Employing emerging technologies such as motion capture to study the complex interplay between genotype and power-related performance traits.Frontiers in physiology · 2024Review
- Genetic Risk and OCT-Based Phenotypic Associations in Age-Related Macular Degeneration.Ophthalmology scienceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Regardless of the overwhelming use of next-generation sequencing technologies, microarray-based genotyping combined with the imputation of untyped variants remains a cost-effective means to interrogate genetic variations across the human genome. This technology is widely used in genome-wide association studies (GWAS) at bio-bank scales, and more recently, in polygenic score (PGS) analysis to predict and stratify disease risk. Over the last decade, human genotyping arrays have undergone a tremendous growth in both number and content making a comprehensive evaluation of their performances became more important. Here, we performed a comprehensive performance assessment for 23 available human genotyping arrays in 6 ancestry groups using diverse public and in-house datasets. The analyses focus on performance estimation of derived imputation (in terms of accuracy and coverage) and PGS (in terms of concordance to PGS estimated from whole-genome sequencing data) in three different traits and diseases. We found that the arrays with a higher number of SNPs are not necessarily the ones with higher imputation performance, but the arrays that are well-optimized for the targeted population could provide very good imputation performance. In addition, PGS estimated by imputed SNP array data is highly correlated to PGS estimated by whole-genome sequencing data in most cases. When optimal arrays are used, the correlations of PGS between two types of data are higher than 0.97, but interestingly, arrays with high density can result in lower PGS performance. Our results suggest the importance of properly selecting a suitable genotyping array for PGS applications. Finally, we developed a web tool that provides interactive analyses of tag SNP contents and imputation performance based on population and genomic regions of interest. This study would act as a practical guide for researchers to design their genotyping arrays-based studies. The tool is available at: https://genome.vinbigdata.org/tools/saa/ .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.