ArticleScientific reports2022
Comparison of the inhibitory effect of tocilizumab and etanercept on the progression of joint erosion in rheumatoid arthritis treatment.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cost-consequence analysis of tocilizumab versus adalimumab and etanercept among rheumatoid arthritis patients in Saudi Arabia: a single-center study.Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We compared the efficacy of tocilizumab and etanercept in inhibiting radiographic progression of joint destruction in rheumatoid arthritis. Overall, 187 patients treated with etanercept or tocilizumab were selected. To adjust for baseline patient characteristics between the tocilizumab and etanercept treatment groups, a propensity score matching was performed. Radiographic progression of joint destruction was compared between patients treated with tocilizumab or etanercept. Clinical disease activity index (CDAI) and modified health assessment questionnaire (mHAQ) scores at the administration of biologic treatment and after 12 months of tocilizumab and etanercept therapy were measured and compared to radiographical parameters between the groups. Levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), matrix metalloproteinase-3 (MMP-3), CDAI, and mHAQ scores improved after 12 months of treatment in the two groups. Proportion of patients with no Sharp erosion score progression was significantly higher with tocilizumab treatment than with etanercept treatment (p = 0.032). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that Sharp erosion score was significantly associated with baseline CDAI (odds ratio, 1.05; 95% confidence interval, 1.003-1.099, p = 0.037). Tocilizumab treatment suppressed joint erosion progression compared to etanercept, and the progression correlated with baseline CDAI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.