Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36266414›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Comparison of fractal and grid electrodes for studying the effects of spatial confinement on dissociated retinal neuronal and glial behavior.

Saba Moslehi, Conor Rowland, Julian H Smith, Willem Griffiths, William J Watterson, Cristopher M Niell, Benjamín J Alemán, Maria-Thereza Perez, Richard P Taylor

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Saba MoslehiPhysics Department, 1371 University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, 97403, USA.
Conor RowlandPhysics Department, 1371 University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, 97403, USA.
Julian H SmithPhysics Department, 1371 University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, 97403, USA.
Willem GriffithsDepartment of Biology, 1210 University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, 97403, USA.
William J WattersonPhysics Department, 1371 University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, 97403, USA.
Cristopher M NiellDepartment of Biology, 1210 University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, 97403, USA.
Benjamín J AlemánPhysics Department, 1371 University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, 97403, USA.
Maria-Thereza PerezDivision of Ophthalmology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, 221 84, Lund, Sweden.
Richard P TaylorPhysics Department, 1371 University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, 97403, USA. rpt@uoregon.edu.
University of Oregon · USLund University · SEOregon Center For Applied Science (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the impact of the geometry and material composition of electrodes on the survival and behavior of retinal cells is of importance for both fundamental cell studies and neuromodulation applications. We investigate how dissociated retinal cells from C57BL/6J mice interact with electrodes made of vertically-aligned carbon nanotubes grown on silicon dioxide substrates. We compare electrodes with different degrees of spatial confinement, specifically fractal and grid electrodes featuring connected and disconnected gaps between the electrodes, respectively. For both electrodes, we find that neuron processes predominantly accumulate on the electrode rather than the gap surfaces and that this behavior is strongest for the grid electrodes. However, the 'closed' character of the grid electrode gaps inhibits glia from covering the gap surfaces. This lack of glial coverage for the grids is expected to have long-term detrimental effects on neuronal survival and electrical activity. In contrast, the interconnected gaps within the fractal electrodes promote glial coverage. We describe the differing cell responses to the two electrodes and hypothesize that there is an optimal geometry that maximizes the positive response of both neurons and glia when interacting with electrodes.

Indexed as

Nanotubes, CarbonRetinal NeuronsAnimalsElectrodesFractalsMiceMice, Inbred C57BLNeurogliaSilicon DioxideNanotubes, CarbonSilicon Dioxide

Identifiers

PMID36266414
PMCPMC9584887
OpenAlexW4306871110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.