Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36266369›Full record

ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2023

Revision ACL reconstruction using quadriceps, hamstring and patellar tendon autografts leads to similar functional outcomes but hamstring graft has a higher tendency of graft failure.

Amit Meena, Luca Farinelli, Christian Hoser, Elisabeth Abermann, Akshya Raj, Caroline Hepperger, Mirco Herbort, Christian Fink

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Amit MeenaGelenkpunkt-Sports and Joint Surgery, FIFA Medical Centre of Excellence, Olympiastraße 39, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Luca FarinelliClinical Orthopaedics, Department of Clinical and Molecular Sciences, Università Politecnica Delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.
Christian HoserGelenkpunkt-Sports and Joint Surgery, FIFA Medical Centre of Excellence, Olympiastraße 39, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Elisabeth AbermannGelenkpunkt-Sports and Joint Surgery, FIFA Medical Centre of Excellence, Olympiastraße 39, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Akshya RajCentral Institute of Orthopaedics, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, 110029, India.
Caroline HeppergerGelenkpunkt-Sports and Joint Surgery, FIFA Medical Centre of Excellence, Olympiastraße 39, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Mirco HerbortResearch Unit for Orthopaedic Sports Medicine and Injury Prevention (OSMI), Medical Informatics and Technology, Private University for Health Sciences, Innsbruck, Austria.
Christian FinkGelenkpunkt-Sports and Joint Surgery, FIFA Medical Centre of Excellence, Olympiastraße 39, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria. c.fink@gelenkpunkt.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8446-2434

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the differences in the patient-reported functional outcomes, and graft failure in revision ACL reconstruction using quadriceps tendon (QT), Hamstring tendon (HT) and bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) autografts.

methodsBetween 2010 and 2020, 97 patients who underwent revision ACL reconstruction (40 patients received a QT, 26 an HT and 31 a BPTB graft) met the inclusion criteria. Pre-injury and at 2-year postoperatively patients were evaluated for patient-reported functional outcomes; Lysholm knee score, Tegner activity level and VAS (visual analogue scale) for pain; and graft failure. Patient-reported outcomes and graft failure were compared between the QT, HT and BPTB groups. The patients with graft failure were not included for outcome analysis at 2-years of follow-up.

resultsAll three revision groups with QT, HT and BPTB autograft did not differ significantly in terms of age, sex, time from injury to surgery, concomitant injuries and single-stage or double-stage procedures (n.s.). No significant difference was found in the pre-injury patient-reported outcome; Lysholm knee score, Tegner activity and VAS for pain (n.s.) between the three groups. At the 2-year follow-up functional outcomes improved in all three groups and all the patients returned to pre-injury activity level; however, no significant difference was found in functional outcomes at the 2-year follow-up between the three groups (n.s.). Graft failure occurred in 4 (10%), 5 (19%) and 3 (10%) patients of QT, HT and BPTB groups, respectively. However, the rate of failure did not differ significantly between groups.

conclusionAll three autografts (QT, HT and BPTB) demonstrated satisfactory patient-reported outcomes in revision ACL reconstruction. Compared with QT and BPTB grafts, HT graft showed a higher tendency for failure rates. With the increasing incidence of revision ACL reconstruction, surgeons should be aware of all the available graft options. The findings of this study will assist the surgeons in the graft selection for revision ACL reconstruction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Indexed as

Anterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesAnterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionHamstring TendonsPatellar LigamentAutograftsBone-Patellar Tendon-Bone GraftingHumansPainTransplantation, AutologousACLAnterior cruciate ligamentAutograftBPTBFunctional outcomeGraft failureHamstring tendonHTPatellar tendonQTQuadriceps tendonRevision

Identifiers

PMID36266369
PMCPMC10183416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.