ArticleScientific reports2022
An automatic hypothesis generation for plausible linkage between xanthium and diabetes.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quantifying Evidence for Competing Biomedical Hypotheses using Large Language Models and Bayesian Analysis.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Transformer models in biomedicine.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024Review
- Learning to Rank Complex Biomedical Hypotheses for Accelerating Scientific Discovery.Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics · 2024Article
- Editorial: Emerging areas in literature-based discovery.Frontiers in research metrics and analytics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There has been a significant increase in text mining implementation for biomedical literature in recent years. Previous studies introduced the implementation of text mining and literature-based discovery to generate hypotheses of potential candidates for drug development. By conducting a hypothesis-generation step and using evidence from published journal articles or proceedings, previous studies have managed to reduce experimental time and costs. First, we applied the closed discovery approach from Swanson's ABC model to collect publications related to 36 Xanthium compounds or diabetes. Second, we extracted biomedical entities and relations using a knowledge extraction engine, the Public Knowledge Discovery Engine for Java or PKDE4J. Third, we built a knowledge graph using the obtained bio entities and relations and then generated paths with Xanthium compounds as source nodes and diabetes as the target node. Lastly, we employed graph embeddings to rank each path and evaluated the results based on domain experts' opinions and literature. Among 36 Xanthium compounds, 35 had direct paths to five diabetes-related nodes. We ranked 2,740,314 paths in total between 35 Xanthium compounds and three diabetes-related phrases: type 1 diabetes, type 2 diabetes, and diabetes mellitus. Based on the top five percentile paths, we concluded that adenosine, choline, beta-sitosterol, rhamnose, and scopoletin were potential candidates for diabetes drug development using natural products. Our framework for hypothesis generation employs a closed discovery from Swanson's ABC model that has proven very helpful in discovering biological linkages between bio entities. The PKDE4J tools we used to capture bio entities from our document collection could label entities into five categories: genes, compounds, phenotypes, biological processes, and molecular functions. Using the BioPREP model, we managed to interpret the semantic relatedness between two nodes and provided paths containing valuable hypotheses. Lastly, using a graph-embedding algorithm in our path-ranking analysis, we exploited the semantic relatedness while preserving the graph structure properties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.