Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36265905›Full record

ArticleeNeuro

Context Binding in Visual Working Memory Is Reflected in Bilateral Event-Related Potentials, But Not in Contralateral Delay Activity.

Ying Cai, Jacqueline M Fulvio, Jason Samaha, Bradley R Postle

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT03787134 (Oscillatory Contributions to Working Memory and Attention), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03787134 nacompletednot on this map

Oscillatory Contributions to Working Memory and Attention

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Wisconsin, MadisonRan2019 to 2023Enrolled184ConditionsYoung AdultsArmsworking memory and attention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. EEG Correlates of Active Removal from Working Memory.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Effects of Context Changes on Memory Reactivation.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ying CaiDepartment of Psychology and Behavioral Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310007, People's Republic of China yingcai@zju.edu.cn postle@wisc.edu.
Jacqueline M FulvioDepartment of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0055-4308
Jason SamahaDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, California 95064.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8010-5993
Bradley R PostleDepartment of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706.

Funding

Oscillatory Contributions to Working Memory and AttentionR01MH095984 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI POSTLE, BRADLEY R · 2013 to 2023
$4.8M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH095984
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Successful retrieval of a specific item from visual working memory (VWM) depends on the binding of that item to its unique context. Recent functional magnetic resonance imaging studies of VWM manipulating memory set homogeneity have identified an important role for the intraparietal sulcus in context binding, independent of any role in representing stimulus identity. The current study explored whether the contralateral delay activity (CDA), which is an event-related potential (ERP) component derived from posterior electrodes that tracks the amount of information held in VWM, might also be sensitive to context-binding demands. In experiment 1, human participants performed lateralized delayed recognition with memory sets containing one, three, or five items that were drawn from the same category (orientations: "homogeneous") or from different categories (orientation, color, and luminance: "heterogeneous"). Because the location and identity of the memory probe indicated the item to be retrieved, homogeneous trials placed higher context-binding demands. VWM capacity was higher in heterogeneous trials. ERPs contralateral (contra) and ipsilateral (ipsi) to the remembered stimuli were higher for homogeneous trials, but these differences were removed in the contra - ipsi subtraction that produced the CDA. In experiment 2, human participants performed lateralized delayed recall with memory sets of one or three items (homogeneous or heterogeneous). Behavior was superior for three-item heterogeneous trials than for homogeneous trials, with modeling revealing context-binding errors in the latter. Bilateral ERPs and CDA results replicated experiment 1. These results support that the CDA tracks the number of object files engaged by VWM and establish that it is not sensitive to context-binding demands.

Indexed as

Memory, Short-TermVisual PerceptionElectroencephalographyEvoked PotentialsHumansParietal LobePhotic Stimulationcontext-bindingcontralateral delay activityvisual working memory

Identifiers

PMID36265905
PMCPMC9652780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.