Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36265793›Full record

ArticleNeurobiology of learning and memory2022

Generalizing the control architecture of the lateral prefrontal cortex.

McKinney Pitts, Derek Evan Nee

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurobiology of learning and memory, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. How alexithymia shapes functional networks: Insights from a general population study.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2026
    Article
  2. Complex functions of human lateral frontopolar cortex.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Cingulo-Opercular Subnetworks Motivate Frontoparietal Subnetworks during Distinct Cognitive Control Demands.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

McKinney PittsDepartment of Psychology, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306-4301, United States.
Derek Evan NeeDepartment of Psychology, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306-4301, United States. Electronic address: nee@psy.fsu.edu.
Florida State University · US

Funding

MEMORYP01NS040813 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI D'ESPOSITO, MARK · 2002 to 2012
$12.9M
Working Memory and Prefrontal CortexR01MH063901 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI D'ESPOSITO, MARK · 2001 to 2022
$7.6M
Hierarchical Interactions Supporting Cognitive ControlR01MH121509 · NIMH · FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI NEE, DEREK EVAN · 2020 to 2025
$1.9M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH063901NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH121509NINDS NIH HHS P01 NS040813
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cognitive control guides non-habitual, goal directed behaviors allowing us to flexibly adapt to ongoing demands. Previous work has suggested that multiple cognitive control processes exist that can be classed according to their action on present-oriented/external information versus future-oriented/internal information. These processes can be mapped onto the lateral prefrontal cortex (LPFC) such that increasingly rostral areas are involved in increasingly future-oriented/internal control processes. Whether and how such processes are organized to support goal-directed behavior remains unclear. On the one hand, the LPFC may flexibly adapt based upon demands. On the other hand, there may be a consistent control architecture such as a control hierarchy that generalizes across demands. Previous work using fMRI in humans during a comprehensive control task that engaged several control processes at once found that an area in mid-LPFC consistently exerted widespread influence throughout the LPFC. These data suggested that the mid-LPFC forms an apex of a putative control hierarchy. However, whether such an architecture generalizes across tasks remains to be tested. Here, we utilized a modified comprehensive control task designed to alter how control processes influence one another to test the generalizability of the LPFC control architecture. Univariate fMRI activations revealed distinct control-related activations relative to past work. Despite these changes, effective connectivity modeling revealed a directed architecture similar to previous findings with the mid-LPFC exerting the most widespread influences throughout LPFC. These results suggest that the fundamental control architecture of the LPFC is relatively fixed, and that different demands are accommodated through modulations of this fixed architecture.

Indexed as

Brain MappingPrefrontal CortexHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingCognitive controlDynamic causal modelingfMRIHierarchyPrefrontal cortex

Identifiers

PMID36265793
PMCPMC11514053
OpenAlexW4306688040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.