Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36265502›Full record

Trial reportThe Lancet. Oncology2022

Pembrolizumab versus placebo as adjuvant therapy in resected stage IIB or IIC melanoma (KEYNOTE-716): distant metastasis-free survival results of a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, phase 3 trial.

Georgina V Long, Jason J Luke, Muhammad A Khattak, Luis de la Cruz Merino, Michele Del Vecchio, Piotr Rutkowski, Francesco Spagnolo, Jacek Mackiewicz, Vanna Chiarion-Sileni, John M Kirkwood and 15 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter StudyClinical Trial, Phase III
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Lancet. Oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03553836 (Adjuvant Therapy With Pembrolizumab Versus Placebo in Resected High-risk Stage II Melanoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 80 papers, 13 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
80citing papers in PubMed, 13 pooled it
15.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03553836 phase3active not recruitingnot on this map

Adjuvant Therapy With Pembrolizumab Versus Placebo in Resected High-risk Stage II Melanoma: A Randomized, Double-blind Phase 3 Study (KEYNOTE-716)

TypeinterventionalSponsorMerck Sharp & Dohme LLCRan2018 to 2033Enrolled976ConditionsMelanomaArmsPembrolizumab, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

80 citing papers in PubMed, 13 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 143 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Cancer-related fatigue during treatment with neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. SEOM-GEM clinical guidelines for cutaneous melanoma (2023).Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2024
    Guideline
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Guideline
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Review

20 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors at 20 institutions in 9 countries.

Georgina V LongMelanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Royal North Shore & Mater Hospitals, Sydney, NSW, Australia. Electronic address: georgina.long@sydney.edu.au.
Jason J LukeDepartment of Medicine, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Muhammad A KhattakFiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia; Edith Cowan University, Perth, WA, Australia.
Luis de la Cruz MerinoMedical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Seville, Spain.
Michele Del VecchioFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy.
Piotr RutkowskiDepartment of Soft Tissue, Bone Sarcoma, and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.
Francesco SpagnoloIRCCS San Martino Polyclinic Hospital, Genoa, Italy.
Jacek MackiewiczDepartment of Medical and Experimental Oncology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland; Department of Diagnostics and Cancer Immunology, Greater Poland Cancer Center, Poznan, Poland.
Vanna Chiarion-SileniIstituto Oncologico Veneto, IOV-IRCCS, Padova, Italy.
John M KirkwoodDepartment of Medicine, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Caroline RobertDepartment of Dermatology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Paris-Saclay University, Villejuif, France.
Jean-Jacques GrobAP-HM Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France.
Federica de GalitiisDepartment of Oncology and Dermatological Oncology, Dermopathic Institute of the Immaculate IDI-IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Dirk SchadendorfDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen & German Cancer Consortium Partner Site, Essen, Germany.
Matteo S CarlinoMelanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Westmead and Blacktown Hospitals, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Peter MohrElbe Kliniken Buxtehude, Buxtehude, Germany.
Reinhard DummerUniversity Hospital Zürich Skin Cancer Center, Zürich, Switzerland.
Jeffrey E GershenwaldThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Charles H YoonDepartment of Surgery, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Xi Lawrence WuMerck & Co, Rahway, NJ, USA.
Mizuho Fukunaga-KalabisMerck & Co, Rahway, NJ, USA.
Clemens KreplerMerck & Co, Rahway, NJ, USA.
Alexander M M EggermontUniversity Medical Center Utrecht & Princess Máxima Center, Utrecht, Netherlands; Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, Munich, Germany.
Paolo A AsciertoIstituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Naples, Italy.
KEYNOTE-716 Investigators
Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) · USUPMC Hillman Cancer Center · USAix-Marseille Université · FRDana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center · USElbe Kliniken Stade-Buxtehude · DEEssen University Hospital · DEFiona Stanley Hospital · AUFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori · ITHospital Universitario Virgen Macarena · ESIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITIstituto Dermopatico dell'Immacolata · ITIstituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale" · ITMelanoma Institute Australia · AUOspedale Policlinico San Martino · ITPoznan University of Medical Sciences · PLPrincess Máxima Center · NLThe Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology · PLThe University of Sydney · AUThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversité Paris-Saclay · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with stage IIB or IIC melanoma who undergo surgery alone are at a substantial risk for disease recurrence. Adjuvant pembrolizumab significantly improved recurrence-free survival versus placebo in stage IIB or IIC melanoma in the first interim analysis of the KEYNOTE-716 trial. Here, we report results from the secondary endpoint of distant metastasis-free survival (prespecified third interim analysis), and recurrence-free survival with longer follow-up.

methodsKEYNOTE-716 is a multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover or rechallenge, randomised, phase 3 trial done at 160 academic medical centres and hospitals across 16 countries. Eligible patients were aged 12 years and older with newly-diagnosed, completely resected, and histologically confirmed stage IIB (T3b or T4a) or IIC (T4b) cutaneous melanoma; negative sentinel lymph node biopsy; and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either 200 mg of pembrolizumab (2 mg/kg up to a maximum of 200 mg in paediatric patients) or placebo, both intravenously, every 3 weeks for 17 cycles (part 1) or until disease recurrence or unacceptable toxicity. Eligible patients with disease recurrence could receive further treatment with pembrolizumab in the part 2 crossover or rechallenge phase. Randomisation was done using an interactive response technology system and stratified by T category and paediatric status. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed recurrence-free survival (assessed here with longer follow-up), and we report the prespecified third interim analysis of distant metastasis-free survival (secondary endpoint). Efficacy analyses were done in the intention-to-treat population (all patients who were randomly assigned, according to assigned group) and safety was assessed in all patients who were randomly assigned and received at least one dose of trial treatment, according to the treatment received. KEYNOTE-716 is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03553836, and has completed recruitment.

findingsBetween Sept 23, 2018, and Nov 4, 2020, 976 patients were randomly assigned to receive pembrolizumab (n=487) or placebo (n=489). At a median follow-up of 27·4 months (IQR 23·1-31·7), median distant metastasis-free survival was not reached (95% CI not reached [NR]-NR) in either group. Pembrolizumab significantly improved distant metastasis-free survival (hazard ratio [HR] 0·64, 95% CI 0·47-0·88, p=0·0029) versus placebo. Median recurrence-free survival was 37·2 months (95% CI NR-NR) in the pembrolizumab group and not reached in the placebo group (95% CI NR-NR). The risk of recurrence remained lower with pembrolizumab versus placebo (HR 0·64, 95% CI 0·50-0·84). The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events were hypertension (16 [3%] of 483 patients in the pembrolizumab group vs 17 [4%] of 486 patients in the placebo group), diarrhoea (eight [2%] vs one [<1%]), rash (seven [1%] vs two [<1%]), autoimmune hepatitis (seven [1%] vs two [<1%]), and increased lipase (six [1%] vs eight [2%]). Treatment-related serious adverse events occurred in 49 (10%) patients in the pembrolizumab group and 11 (2%) patients in the placebo group. No treatment-related deaths were reported.

interpretationAdjuvant pembrolizumab is an efficacious treatment option for resected stage IIB and IIC melanoma, with significant improvement in distant-metastasis free survival versus placebo and continued reduction in the risk of recurrence with an adverse event profile consistent with previous studies of pembrolizumab. The overall benefit-risk of pembrolizumab continues to be positive in the adjuvant setting.

fundingMerck Sharp & Dohme, a subsidiary of Merck & Co.

Indexed as

MelanomaSkin NeoplasmsTesticular NeoplasmsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsChildDouble-Blind MethodHumansMaleNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalAntibodies, Monoclonal, Humanizedpembrolizumab

Identifiers

PMID36265502
OpenAlexW4306649419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.