Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36265261›Full record

ArticleESMO open2022

The meaning of screening: detection of brain metastasis in the adjuvant setting for stage III melanoma.

S H A E Derks, K de Joode, E E A P Mulder, L S Ho, A Joosse, M J A de Jonge, C Verhoef, D J Grünhagen, M Smits, M J van den Bent and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ESMO open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

S H A E DerksDepartment of Neuro-Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
K de JoodeDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
E E A P MulderDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
L S HoDepartment of Neuro-Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
A JoosseDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Electronic address: https://twitter.com/Arjen_Joosse.
M J A de JongeDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
C VerhoefDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
D J GrünhagenDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
M SmitsDepartment of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Electronic address: https://twitter.com/MarionSmits.
M J van den BentDepartment of Neuro-Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Electronic address: https://twitter.com/MartinvdenBent.
A A M van der VeldtDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Electronic address: a.vanderveldt@erasmusmc.nl.
Erasmus MC Cancer Institute · NLErasmus MC · NLTwitter (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe incidence of melanoma is increasing and 37% of patients with metastatic melanoma eventually have brain metastasis (BM). Currently, there is no consensus on screening for BM in patients with resected stage III melanoma. However, given the high incidence of BM, routine screening magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain is considered in patients with completely resected stage III melanoma before the start of adjuvant treatment. The aim of this study was to assess the yield of screening for BM in these patients. MATERIALS AND

methodsA single-center cohort study was carried out in the Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, a large tertiary referral center for patients with melanoma. Eligible patients with complete resection of stage III melanoma and a screening MRI of the brain, made within 12 weeks after resection and before adjuvant treatment (programmed cell death protein 1 inhibitors, dabrafenib-trametinib), available between 1 August 2018 and 1 January 2021, were included.

resultsA total of 202 patients were included. Eighteen (8.9%) of 202 patients had extracranial metastasis at screening. Two (1.1%) of the remaining 184 patients had BM at screening, resulting in a switch from adjuvant treatment to ipilimumab-nivolumab. At a median follow-up of 21.2 months, BM was detected in another 4 (2.4%) of 166 patients who started with adjuvant treatment.

conclusionsThe yield of screening MRI of the brain is low after complete resection of stage III melanoma, before the start of adjuvant treatment. Therefore, routine screening MRI is not recommended in this setting.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsMelanomaSkin NeoplasmsCohort StudiesCutaneous Malignant MelanomaHumansadjuvant treatmentbrain metastasisdabrafenib–trametinibmelanomaMRI of the brainnivolumabpembrolizumabscreeningstage III

Identifiers

PMID36265261
PMCPMC9808474
OpenAlexW4306650319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.