Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36265116›Full record

ArticleJCO precision oncology2022

Parental Preferences Surrounding Timing and Content of Consent Conversations for Clinical Germline Genetic Testing Following a Child's New Cancer Diagnosis.

Belinda N Mandrell, Liza Marie Johnson, Mary Caples, Jami Gattuso, Jamie L Maciaszek, Roya Mostafavi, Katianne M Howard Sharp, Kim E Nichols

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCO precision oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Belinda N MandrellDivision of Nursing Research, Department of Pediatrics, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN.ORCID 0000-0002-6041-7559
Liza Marie JohnsonDepartment of Oncology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN.ORCID 0000-0002-7124-979X
Mary CaplesDivision of Nursing Research, Department of Pediatrics, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN.
Jami GattusoDivision of Nursing Research, Department of Pediatrics, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN.
Jamie L MaciaszekDepartment of Pathology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN.ORCID 0000-0002-9217-5638
Roya MostafaviDivision of Cancer Predisposition, Department of Oncology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN.ORCID 0000-0002-6606-2920
Katianne M Howard SharpDepartment of Psychology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN.ORCID 0000-0002-4823-9702
Kim E NicholsDivision of Cancer Predisposition, Department of Oncology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN.ORCID 0000-0002-5581-6555

Funding

Viral Vector Technology (VVTSR)P30CA021765 · NCI · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI CHARLES ROBERTS · 1985 to 2026
$166.9M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA021765
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeClinical genomic testing is increasingly being used to direct pediatric cancer care. Many centers are interested in offering testing of tumors and paired germline tissues at or near the time of cancer diagnosis. We conducted this study to better understand parent preferences surrounding timing and content of consent conversations for clinical germline genetic testing of their children with cancer as a part of real-time cancer care. PATIENTS AND

methodsA seven-question survey developed by the Division of Cancer Predisposition and collaborators at St Jude Children's Research Hospital (St Jude) was distributed to members of the St Jude Patient Family Advisory Council, which included parents of childhood cancer survivors and bereaved parents whose children with cancer had died. Parents were asked to provide free text comments after each question. Qualitative methods were used to derive codes from parent comments, and survey results were depicted using descriptive statistics.

resultsThe survey was completed by 172 parents. Ninety-three (54%) endorsed an approach for consent conversations ≥ 1 month after cancer diagnosis, whereas 58 (34%) endorsed an approach at 1-2 weeks and 21 (12%) at 1-2 days. Needing time to adjust to a new or relapsed cancer diagnosis and feeling overwhelmed were frequent themes; however, parents acknowledged the urgency and importance of testing. Parents desired testing of as many cancer-related genes as possible, with clinical utility the most important factor for proceeding with testing. Most parents (75%) desired germline results to be disclosed in person, preferably by a genetic counselor.

conclusionParents described urgency and benefits associated with germline testing, but desired flexibility in timing to allow for initial adjustment after their child's cancer diagnosis.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsParentsChildGenetic TestingGerm CellsHumansInformed Consent

Identifiers

PMID36265116
PMCPMC9848596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.