Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36265088›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2023

Health Benefits and Cost-Effectiveness of Children's Oncology Group Breast Cancer Screening Guidelines for Chest-Irradiated Hodgkin Lymphoma Survivors.

F Lennie Wong, Janie M Lee, Wendy M Leisenring, Joseph P Neglia, Rebecca M Howell, Susan A Smith, Kevin C Oeffinger, Chaya S Moskowitz, Tara O Henderson, Ann Mertens and 6 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Longitudinal adherence to surveillance for late effects of cancer treatment: a population-based study of adult survivors of childhood cancer.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 12 institutions in 2 countries.

F Lennie WongCity of Hope, Duarte, CA.ORCID 0000-0002-4333-5017
Janie M LeeUniversity of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA.ORCID 0000-0002-6452-8168
Wendy M LeisenringFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA.ORCID 0000-0001-7405-0906
Joseph P NegliaUniversity of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN.ORCID 0000-0002-5525-0598
Rebecca M HowellThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Susan A SmithThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.ORCID 0000-0002-6367-3080
Kevin C OeffingerDuke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.ORCID 0000-0003-0806-7894
Chaya S MoskowitzMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.ORCID 0000-0002-2850-8450
Tara O HendersonUniversity of Chicago, Chicago, IL.ORCID 0000-0001-9394-6206
Ann MertensEmory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.
Paul C NathanThe Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON.ORCID 0000-0003-0334-0871
Yutaka YasuiSt Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN.ORCID 0000-0002-7717-8638
Wendy LandierUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.ORCID 0000-0003-3319-5652
Gregory T ArmstrongSt Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN.
Leslie L RobisonSt Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN.ORCID 0000-0001-7460-8578
Smita BhatiaUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.ORCID 0000-0002-7755-5683
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USCity of Hope · USDuke University · USEmory University · USFred Hutch Cancer Center · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USUniversity of Chicago · USUniversity of Minnesota Medical Center · USUniversity of Toronto · CAUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Women's Cancer Research ProgramP30CA014236 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI DONNA NIEDZWIECKI · 1985 to 2026
$174.8M
Viral Vector Technology (VVTSR)P30CA021765 · NCI · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI CHARLES ROBERTS · 1985 to 2026
$166.9M
Mach-LETSGO: Machine-LEarning of Treatment, Survey, and Genetics towards Obtaining Correct Classification of Chronic Conditions in Adult Survivors in the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study - CCSS SupplU24CA055727 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI Gregory Armstrong · 1999 to 2026
$96.7M
EPA EP-C-17-017NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS P30 CA014236NCI NIH HHS P30 CA021765NCI NIH HHS U24 CA055727
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the outcomes and cost-effectiveness of the Children's Oncology Group Guideline recommendation for breast cancer (BC) screening using mammography (MAM) and breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in female chest-irradiated childhood Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) survivors. Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT), increasingly replacing MAM in practice, was also examined.

methodsLife years (LYs), quality-adjusted LYs (QALYs)

resultsWith 100% screening adherence, annual BC screening extended LYs by 0.34-0.46 years over no screening. If the willingness-to-pay threshold to gain a quality-adjusted LY was ICER < $100,000 USD, annual MAM at age 25-74 years was the only cost-effective strategy. When nonadherence was taken into consideration, only annual MAM at age 30-74 years (ICER = $56,972 USD) was cost-effective. Supplementing annual MAM with MRI costing $545 USD was not cost-effective under either adherence condition. If MRI costs were reduced to $300 USD, adding MRI to annual MAM at age 30-74 years could become more cost-effective, particularly in the reduced adherence condition (ICER = $133,682 USD).

conclusionAnnual BC screening using MAM at age 30-74 years is effective and cost-effective in female chest-irradiated HL survivors. Although annual adjunct MRI is not cost-effective at $545 USD cost, it could become cost-effective as MRI cost is reduced, a plausible scenario with the emergent use of abbreviated MRI.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsHodgkin DiseaseAdultAgedChildCost-Benefit AnalysisEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMammographyMass ScreeningMiddle AgedSurvivors

Identifiers

PMID36265088
PMCPMC9928841
OpenAlexW4306921840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.