Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36264999›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Circular bioeconomy in African food systems: What is the status quo? Insights from Rwanda, DRC, and Ethiopia.

Haruna Sekabira, Elke Nijman, Leonhard Späth, Pius Krütli, Marc Schut, Bernard Vanlauwe, Benjamin Wilde, Kokou Kintche, Speciose Kantengwa, Abayneh Feyso and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Haruna SekabiraDivision of Natural Resources Management, International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Kigali, Rwanda.ORCID 0000-0001-5675-7211
Elke NijmanDivision of Natural Resources Management, International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Kigali, Rwanda.
Leonhard SpäthDepartment of Environmental Systems Science, Sustainable Agroecosystems, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Pius KrütliDepartment of Environmental Systems Science, Transdisciplinarity Lab (TdLab), ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Marc SchutDivision of Natural Resources Management, International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Kigali, Rwanda.
Bernard VanlauweDivision of Natural Resources Management, International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Nairobi, Kenya.
Benjamin WildeDepartment of Environmental Systems Science, Sustainable Agroecosystems, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Kokou KintcheDivision of Natural Resources Management, International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Kalambo, DR Congo.
Speciose KantengwaDivision of Natural Resources Management, International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Kigali, Rwanda.
Abayneh FeysoDepartment of Agribusiness and Value Chain Management, Arba Minch University, Arba Minch, Ethiopia.
Byamungu KiganguDivision of Natural Resources Management, International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Kalambo, DR Congo.
Johan SixDepartment of Environmental Systems Science, Sustainable Agroecosystems, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Increasing global food insecurity amidst a growing population and diminishing production resources renders the currently dominant linear production model insufficient to combat such challenges. Hence, a circular bioeconomy (CBE) model that ensures more conservative use of resources has become essential. Specifically, a CBE model that focuses on recycling and reusing organic waste is essential to close nutrient loops and establish more resilient rural-urban nexus food systems. However, the CBE status quo in many African food systems is not established. Moreover, scientific evidence on CBE in Africa is almost inexistent, thus limiting policy guidance to achieving circular food systems. Using a sample of about 2,100 farmers and consumers from key food value chains (cassava in Rwanda, coffee in DRC, and bananas in Ethiopia), we explored existing CBE practices; awareness, knowledge, and support for CBE practices; consumers' opinions on eating foods grown on processed organic waste (CBE fertilizers), and determinants of such opinions. We analysed data in Stata, first descriptively, and then econometrically using the ordered logistic regression, whose proportional odds assumption was violated, thus resorting to the generalized ordered logistic regression. Results show that communities practice aspects of CBE, mainly composting, and are broadly aware, knowledgeable, supportive of CBE practices, and would broadly accept eating foods grown CBE fertilizers. Households with heads that used mobile phones, or whose heads were older, or married, or had a better education and agricultural incomes were more likely to strongly agree that they were knowledgeable and supportive of CBE practices and would eat CBE foods (foods grown on processed organic waste). However, the reverse was true for households that were severely food insecure or lived farther from towns. Rwandan and Ethiopian households compared to DRC were less likely to eat CB foods. Policies to stimulate CBE investments in all three countries were largely absent, and quality scientific evidence to guide their development and implementation is currently insufficient.

Indexed as

CoffeeFertilizersDemocratic Republic of the CongoEthiopiaFood SupplyHumansRwandaVegetablesCoffeeFertilizers

Identifiers

PMID36264999
PMCPMC9584527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.