Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36264892›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Functional representation of the network organisation of dialysis activities in France: A novel level for assessing quality of care.

Cécile Couchoud, René Ecochard, Mathilde Prezelin-Reydit, Thierry Lobbedez, Florian Bayer, in the name of the REIN registry

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Cécile CouchoudREIN Registry, Agence de la Biomédecine, Saint-Denis La Plaine, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9273-660X
René EcochardUniversité Lyon I, CNRS, UMR 5558, Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive, Equipe Biostatistique Santé, Villeurbanne, France.
Mathilde Prezelin-ReyditMaison du REIN-AURAD Aquitaine, Gradignan, France.
Thierry LobbedezService de Néphrologie, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire, Caen, France.
Florian BayerREIN Registry, Agence de la Biomédecine, Saint-Denis La Plaine, France.
in the name of the REIN registry

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To assess quality of care, groups of care units that cared for the same patients at various stages of end-stage renal disease, might be more appropriate than the centre level. These groups constitute "communities" that need to be delineated to evaluate their practices and outcomes. In this article, we describe the use of an agglomerative (Fast Greedy) and a divisive (Edge Betweenness) method to describe dialysis activities in France. The validation was based on the opinion of the field actors at the regional level of the REIN registry. At the end of 2018, ESRD care in France took place in 1,166 dialysis units. During 2016-2018, 32 965 transfers occurred between dialysis units. With the Edge Betweenness method, the 1,114 French dialysis units in metropolitan France were classified into 156 networks and with the Fast Greedy algorithm, 167 networks. Among the 32 965 transfers, 23 168 (70%) were defined in the same cluster by the Edge Betweenness algorithm and 26 016 (79%) in the same cluster by the Fast Greedy method. According to the Fast Greedy method, during the study period, 95% of patients received treatment in only one network. According to the opinion of the actors in the field, the Fast Greedy algorithm seemed to be the best method in the context of dialysis activity modelling. The Edge Betweenness classification was not retained because it seemed too sensitive to the volume of links between dialysis units.

Indexed as

Kidney Failure, ChronicRenal DialysisFranceHumansOrganizationsRegistries

Identifiers

PMID36264892
PMCPMC9584420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.