Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36264637›Full record

ArticleThe International journal of eating disorders2022

How does the increase in eating difficulties according to the Development and Well-Being Assessment screening items relate to the population prevalence of eating disorders? An analysis of the 2017 Mental Health in Children and Young People survey.

Jessica O'Logbon, Tamsin Newlove-Delgado, Sally McManus, Frances Mathews, Suzanne Hill, Katharine Sadler, Tamsin Ford

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The International journal of eating disorders, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jessica O'LogbonDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1216-9703
Tamsin Newlove-DelgadoMedical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5192-3724
Sally McManusNational Centre for Social Research, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2711-0819
Frances MathewsMedical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1314-4607
Suzanne HillNational Centre for Social Research, London, UK.
Katharine SadlerNational Centre for Social Research, London, UK.
Tamsin FordDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5295-4904
University of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Exeter · GB

Funding

Department of Health BRC-1215-20014Department of Health NIHR300056Medical Research Council G108/625Medical Research Council MR/V027751/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe examine the test accuracy of the Development and Well-Being Assessment (DAWBA) eating disorder screening items to explore whether the increased eating difficulties detected in the English National Mental Health of Children and Young People (MHCYP) Surveys 2021 reflect an increased population prevalence.

methodsStudy 1 calculated sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values from responses to the DAWBA screening items from 4057 11-19-year-olds and their parents, in the 2017 MHCYP survey. Study 2 applied the positive predictive value to data from 1844 11-19-year-olds responding to the 2021 follow-up to estimate the prevalence of eating disorders in England compared to 2017 prevalence.

resultsParental report most accurately predicted an eating disorder (93.6%, 95% confidence interval: 92.7-94.5). Sensitivity increased when parent and child answers were combined, and with a higher threshold (of two) for children. The prevalence of eating disorders in 2021 was 1% in 17-19-year-olds, and .6% in 11-16-year-olds-similar to the prevalence reported in 2017 (.8% and .6%, respectively). However, estimates for boys (.2%-.4%) and young men (.0%-.4%) increased. DISCUSSION: We found tentative evidence of increased population prevalence of eating disorders, particularly among young men. Despite this, the DAWBA screening items are useful for ruling out eating disorders, particularly when parents or carers screen negative, but are relatively poor at predicting who will have a disorder. Data from both parents and children and applying a higher cut point improves accuracy but at the expense of more missed cases. PUBLIC SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: The prevalence of eating disorders did not markedly change from 2017 to 2021, but we found tentative evidence of an increase, particularly among young men. This is despite larger increases in problematic eating, which need further investigation. The DAWBA screen is best suited to ruling out eating disorders which limits its clinical applications as it would provide many false positives requiring further assessment.

Indexed as

Feeding and Eating DisordersMental HealthAdolescentChildEnglandHumansParentseating behavioreating disorderprevalencescreeningsurvey

Identifiers

PMID36264637
PMCPMC10092017
OpenAlexW4306913470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.