ArticleArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2023
Finite element analysis of malposition in bi-unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.
Article in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Surgical factors that contribute to tibial periprosthetic fracture after cementless Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Replacement: a finite element analysis.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Effect of design and surgical parameters variations in mobile-bearing versus fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A finite element analysis.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2024Article
- Effect of different constraining boundary conditions on simulated femoral stresses and strains during gait.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeBi-unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is a less invasive treatment than a total one, great advantage for the patient but more difficult for the surgeon because of the lower visibility during surgery; this can therefore lead to eventual small errors in cutting angles during the procedure. The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of these slight angle variations in terms of anterior-posterior slope for the lateral tibial tray.
methodsThe geometries of the bones were acquired and uncemented fixed bearing metal-back UKAs virtually implanted in a finite elements environment. The lateral component was implanted in six different antero-posterior slope configurations (from - 5° to + 5° respect to medial component). Material properties for implant, bones and soft tissues were taken from the literature. A vertical compressive force of 2000 N was applied in full-extended configuration on the femur. Von Mises stress distribution in proximal tibia, load/pressure/contact area repartitions between the medial and lateral compartments was extracted as outputs.
resultsOutcomes for 0° and - 3° configurations are acceptable, but the - 2° of slope configuration achieved the best ones in terms of stress on proximal tibia, load repartition, contact pressure distribution and shear component. Drastically different results are found for the ± 5° configurations, presenting a level of unbalancing often associated with weak stability and failure over time.
conclusionsSlight errors can happen during the surgery: performing the cut aiming to slightly posterior slopes during the surgery helps to minimize the chances of obtaining positive slopes that could lead to an unstable implant.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36264510What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.