ArticleClinical neuroradiology2023
Is Crash Loading Acceptable in Carotid Artery Stenting? : Results of Antiplatelet Crash Loading vs. Semi-crash vs. Elective Loading in a Large Study Population.
Article in Clinical neuroradiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of Proton Pump Inhibitor Use on Outcomes Following Carotid Artery Stenting for Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis: A Population-Based Cohort Study.The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences · 2026Article
- Antithrombotic Therapy in Carotid Artery and Intracranial Artery Stent.Journal of neuroendovascular therapy · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeIn elective carotid artery stenting (CAS), antiplatelet therapy (APT) is crucial. Several international societies have provided guidelines for loading time and dosage in endovascular treatment; however, no recommendations have been made for urgent, nonthrombectomy-associated CAS without adequate loading time. Here, we investigated the short-term outcomes for APT-naïve patients receiving "crash loading" (CL) on the day of intervention, compared with those for patients wi APT onset 3-5 days (semi-CL) or more than 5 days before CAS (EL).
methodsOutcomes of patients 30 days after CAS were evaluated in terms of the rates of in-stent thrombus, re-stenosis, stroke, hemorrhagic and thrombotic events, other periprocedural occurrences, in-hospital death and CAS-associated death. Patients' biological, pathological and hemostatic factors were recorded and compared.
resultsA total of 1158 patients who received CAS at the authors' neuroradiology institution were analyzed: 275 EL, 846 semi-CL, and 37 CL. The patients receiving CL had the lowest rate of stroke, but the highest rates of CAS-associated and in-hospital deaths, although the deaths were not necessarily associated with APT. In-stent thrombosis was the highest in the semi-CL group. The rates and types of periprocedural occurrences favored the CL group.
conclusionWith the medical regimen used in this study, urgent CAS with CL APT did not produce more ischemic, thrombotic and hemorrhagic complications than longer loading times. However, careful patient selection might be crucial and adequate loading times should remain the standard of care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.