ArticleJournal of rehabilitation medicine2022
Impact of Exercise Training at Different Intensity Levels on Cardiac Function and Exercise Capacity in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure: A Prospective Cohort Study.
Article in Journal of rehabilitation medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Baseline functional oxygen uptake gain as a prognostic factor of center-based exercise responding in well-functioning older adults.European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate training at different intensity levels on cardiac function, exercise capacity, and health-related quality of life in patients with chronic heart failure.
methodsThis prospective cohort study enrolled patients with chronic heart failure at Beijing Rehabilitation Hospital, Beijing, China from January 2018 to January 2020. Participants received conventional therapy (non-exercise group) or therapy plus cycle ergometer exercises at an intensity of 80% anaerobic threshold (EA group) and Δ50% power above anaerobic threshold (EB group) for 12 weeks. The primary outcome was peak oxygen uptake.
resultsForty-five patients (15/group) completed the study without serious complications. Exercise training at an intensity of Δ50% power above anaerobic threshold had better effects on exercise capacity than exercise at an intensity of 80% anaerobic threshold, as shown by a greater improvement in peak oxygen uptake (20.3 ± 4.1 vs 16.8 ± 3.2 mL/min/kg), peak O2 pulse (12.5 ± 2.3 vs 10.1 ± 2.1 mL/beat), and peak workload (123.1 ± 26.9 vs 102.8 ± 29.5 W) in patients with chronic heart failure (all p < 0.001). Exercise improved the 6-min walk test distance (control: 394.0 ± 74.1; EA: 481.4 ± 89.4; EB: 508.9 ± 92.5 m; p < 0.001) and health-related quality of life (control: 40.7 ± 12.3; EA: 16.2 ± 8.6; EB: 11.5 ± 6.4; p < 0.001).
conclusionCompared with an intensity of 80% anaerobic threshold, exercise training at an intensity of Δ 50% power above anaerobic threshold was safe and had better effects on cardiac function, exercise capacity, and health-related quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.