Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36264024›Full record

ArticleThe Australian journal of rural health2022

Co-design of a nurse-led model of care to increase access to medical abortion and contraception in rural and regional general practice: A protocol.

Jessica E Moulton, Danielle Mazza, Jane Tomnay, Deborah Bateson, Wendy V Norman, Kirsten I Black, Asvini K Subasinghe

Open access · hybridAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The Australian journal of rural health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Jessica E MoultonSPHERE, NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence, Department of General Practice, Monash University, Notting Hill, VIC, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7172-9470
Danielle MazzaSPHERE, NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence, Department of General Practice, Monash University, Notting Hill, VIC, Australia.
Jane TomnayCentre for Excellence in Rural Sexual Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Deborah BatesonSpecialty of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Neonatology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Wendy V NormanDepartment of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4340-7882
Kirsten I BlackSpecialty of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Neonatology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Asvini K SubasingheSPHERE, NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence, Department of General Practice, Monash University, Notting Hill, VIC, Australia.
National Health and Medical Research Council · AUThe University of Sydney · AUThe University of Melbourne · AUUniversity of British Columbia · CA

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council 1153592
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

problemWomen in rural and regional Australia experience a number of barriers to accessing sexual and reproductive health care including lack of local services, high costs and misinformation.

settingNurse-led task-sharing models of care for provision of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) and early medical abortion (EMA) are one strategy to reduce barriers and improve access to services but have yet to be developed in general practice. KEY MEASURES FOR IMPROVEMENT: Through a co-design process, we will develop a nurse-led model of care for LARC and EMA provision that can be delivered through face-to-face consultations or via telehealth in rural general practice in Australia. STRATEGIES FOR CHANGE: A co-design workshop, involving consumers, health professionals (particularly General Practitioners (GPs) and Practice Nurses (PNs)), GP managers and key stakeholders will be conducted to design nurse-led models of care for LARC and EMA including implant insertion by nurses. The workshop will be informed by the 'Experience-Based Co-Design' toolkit and involves participants mapping the patient journey for service provision to inform a new model of care. EFFECTS OF CHANGE: Recommendations from the workshop will inform a nurse-led model of care for LARC and EMA provision in rural general practice. The model will provide practical guidance for the set-up and delivery of services. LESSONS LEARNT: Nurses will work to their full scope of practice to increase accessibility of EMA and LARC in rural Australia.

Indexed as

Abortion, InducedGeneral PracticeAustraliaContraceptionFemaleHumansNurse's RolePregnancyabortionco-designcontraceptionnursingprimary care

Identifiers

PMID36264024
PMCPMC10946737
OpenAlexW4306878611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.