Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36263931›Full record

ArticleeLife2022

In situ X-ray-assisted electron microscopy staining for large biological samples.

Sebastian Ströh, Eric W Hammerschmith, David W Tank, H Sebastian Seung, Adrian Andreas Wanner

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Volume electron microscopy.Nature reviews. Methods primers · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 3 countries.

Sebastian Ströh *Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8128-2617
Eric W Hammerschmith *Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, United States.
David W TankPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9423-4267
H Sebastian SeungPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, United States.
Adrian Andreas WannerPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5864-8577
Princeton University · US

Funding

Subcortical Neural Coding and DynamicsU19NS104648 · NINDS · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI BRODY, CARLOS D, GOLDMAN, MARK S · 2017 to 2021
$15.3M
Circuit Mechanisms Underlying Persistent Activity in a Neural IntegratorR01EY027036 · NEI · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI Emre R Aksay, MARK S GOLDMAN · 2016 to 2026
$6.4M
Circuit Mechanisms Underlying Learned Changes in Persistent Neural ActivityR01NS104926 · NINDS · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI AKSAY, EMRE R, GOLDMAN, MARK S · 2018 to 2022
$4.1M
Vertically integrated approach to visual neuroscience: microcircuits to behaviorU01NS090562 · NINDS · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI EULER, THOMAS, HUBERMAN, ANDREW D · 2014 to 2016
$3.6M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY027036NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS104926NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS090562NINDS NIH HHS U19 NS104648
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electron microscopy of biological tissue has recently seen an unprecedented increase in imaging throughput moving the ultrastructural analysis of large tissue blocks such as whole brains into the realm of the feasible. However, homogeneous, high-quality electron microscopy staining of large biological samples is still a major challenge. To date, assessing the staining quality in electron microscopy requires running a sample through the entire staining protocol end-to-end, which can take weeks or even months for large samples, rendering protocol optimization for such samples to be inefficient. Here, we present an in situ time-lapsed X-ray-assisted staining procedure that opens the 'black box' of electron microscopy staining and allows observation of individual staining steps in real time. Using this novel method, we measured the accumulation of heavy metals in large tissue samples immersed in different staining solutions. We show that the measured accumulation of osmium in fixed tissue obeys empirically a quadratic dependence between the incubation time and sample size. We found that potassium ferrocyanide, a classic reducing agent for osmium tetroxide, clears the tissue after osmium staining and that the tissue expands in osmium tetroxide solution, but shrinks in potassium ferrocyanide reduced osmium solution. X-ray-assisted staining gave access to the in situ staining kinetics and allowed us to develop a diffusion-reaction-advection model that accurately simulates the measured accumulation of osmium in tissue. These are first steps towards

Indexed as

OsmiumOsmium TetroxideAnimalsFerrocyanidesHumansMiceMicroscopy, ElectronStaining and LabelingX-RaysFerrocyanidesOsmiumOsmium Tetroxidepotassium ferrocyanideconnectomicselectron microscopymouseneuroscienceosmium stainingwhole brain

Identifiers

PMID36263931
PMCPMC9665849
OpenAlexW4306871131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.