Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36263893›Full record

ArticleAnnals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England2023

Getting it right first time: national survey of surgical site infection 2019.

S A Gatfield, K V Atkinson, D Fountain, J T Machin, A V Navaratnam, M Hutton, Twr Briggs

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

S A GatfieldMusgrove Park Hospital, UK.
K V AtkinsonThe Royal London Hospital, UK.
D FountainSalford Royal NHS Foundation Trust and University of Manchester, UK.
J T MachinThe Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Trust, UK.
A V NavaratnamUniversity London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
M HuttonRoyal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
Twr BriggsThe Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Trust, UK.
Musgrove Park Hospital · GBRoyal Devon & Exeter NHS Foundation Trust · GBRoyal London Hospital · GBRoyal National Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Trust · GBSalford Royal NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity College London · GBUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSurgical site infections (SSIs) are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Deep SSI, or prosthetic joint infection (PJI), is associated with revision surgery involving longer operative times with higher infection rates, longer length of stay (LoS) and high costs in addition to the catastrophic effect on the patient. The surveillance of SSI is important for patient decision making, identification of outliers for support and maximising focussed improvement. This paper reports the findings of the second Getting it Right First Time (GIRFT) national SSI survey for orthopaedic and spinal surgery.

methodsData were submitted prospectively by 67 orthopaedic units and 22 spinal units between 1 May 2019 and 31 October 2019. For a patient to be included, they had to present with SSI within the study period and within 1 year of the index procedure.

resultsA total of 309 SSIs were reported from primary and revision, total hip, knee, shoulder, elbow and ankle replacements, and 58 SSIs were reported from lumbar spine single level discectomy or decompression, lumbar spine single-level instrumented posterior fusion, posterior cervical spine decompression and instrumented fusion and posterior correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. SSIs rates have remained low compared with the 2017 survey. There were variations in SSI rates by procedure, with primary shoulder replacement reporting the lowest (0.4%) and revision shoulder replacement the highest (2.5%) rates.

conclusionsThe authors recommend that the elective surgical restart following the COVID-19 pandemic provides a unique opportunity for all units to implement a full SSI prevention bundle to minimise the risk of infection and improve patient outcomes.

Indexed as

COVID-19Spinal FusionAdolescentHumansMorbidityNeurosurgical ProceduresPandemicsRetrospective StudiesSurgical Wound InfectionInfection controlPopulation surveillancePostoperative carePostoperative complicationsSurgical wound infection

Identifiers

PMID36263893
PMCPMC10313457
OpenAlexW4306871285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.