Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36263842›Full record

ArticleHaematologica2023

Pathology review identifies frequent misdiagnoses in recurrent classic Hodgkin lymphoma in a nationwide cohort: implications for clinical and epidemiological studies.

Max V Boot, Michael Schaapveld, Esther C Van den Broek, Nathalie J Hijmering, Palga Group, Kimberly Van der Oord, Flora E Van Leeuwen, Avinash G Dinmohamed, Lianne Koens, Daphne De Jong

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Haematologica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Max V BootAmsterdam UMC, Department of Pathology, The Netherlands; Reinier Haga MDC, Department of Pathology, Delft. max.boot@reinier-mdc.nl.
Michael SchaapveldNetherlands Cancer Institute, Department of Epidemiology.
Esther C Van den BroekDutch Pathology Registry (PALGA), Houten.
Nathalie J HijmeringAmsterdam UMC, Department of Pathology.
Palga GroupDutch Pathology Registry (PALGA), Houten.
Kimberly Van der OordLaboratorium Pathologie Oost-Nederland (LABPON), Hengelo.
Flora E Van LeeuwenNetherlands Cancer Institute, Department of Epidemiology.
Avinash G DinmohamedDepartment of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands; Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC, Department of Hematology, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam.
Lianne KoensAmsterdam UMC, Department of Pathology.
Daphne De JongAmsterdam UMC, Department of Pathology.
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLThe Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLDutch Centre for Field Ornithology · NLReinier de Graaf Hospital · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients treated for classic Hodgkin lymphoma (CHL) have a reported 13-fold increased risk of developing subsequent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). In light of the growing awareness of CHL mimickers, this study re-assesses this risk based on an in-depth pathology review of a nationwide cohort of patients diagnosed with CHL in the Netherlands (2006-2013) and explores the spectrum of CHL mimickers. Among 2,669 patients with biopsy-proven CHL, 54 were registered with secondary NHL. On review, CHL was confirmed in 25/54 patients. In six of these, the subsequent lymphoma was a primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma/mediastinal gray zone lymphoma, biologically related to CHL and 19/25 were apparently unrelated B-cell NHL. In 29/54 patients, CHL was reclassified as NHL, including T-cell lymphomas with secondary Hodgkin-like B-blasts (n=15), Epstein Barr virus-positive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (n=8), CD30+ T-cell lymphoma (n=3) and indolent B-cell proliferations (n=3). Higher age, disseminated disease at presentation, extensive B-cell marker expression and association with Epstein-Barr virus were identified as markers to alert for CHL mimickers. Based on these data, the risk of developing NHL after CHL treatment was re-calculated to 3.6-fold (standardized incidence ratio 3.61; confidence interval: 2.29-5.42). In addition, this study highlights the clinicopathological pitfalls leading to misinterpretation of CHL and consequences for the care of individual patients, interpretation of trials and epidemiological assessments.

Indexed as

Epstein-Barr Virus InfectionsHodgkin DiseaseLymphomaLymphoma, B-CellLymphoma, Non-HodgkinDiagnostic ErrorsHerpesvirus 4, HumanHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, Local

Identifiers

PMID36263842
PMCPMC10153541
OpenAlexW4306868134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.