Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36263838›Full record

ReviewHaematologica2023

BCMA loss in the epoch of novel immunotherapy for multiple myeloma: from biology to clinical practice.

Xiang Zhou, Leo Rasche, K Martin Kortüm, Julia Mersi, Hermann Einsele

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Haematologica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xiang ZhouDepartment of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital of Würzburg, Würzburg.
Leo RascheDepartment of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital of Würzburg, Würzburg.
K Martin KortümDepartment of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital of Würzburg, Würzburg.
Julia MersiDepartment of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital of Würzburg, Würzburg.
Hermann EinseleDepartment of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital of Würzburg, Würzburg.
Universitätsklinikum Würzburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) is evolving rapidly. In the past few years, chimeric antigen receptor modified T cells and bispecific antibodies are bringing new treatment options to patients with relapsed/refractory MM. Currently, B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) has emerged as the most commonly used target of T-cell-based immunotherapies for relapsed/refractory MM. Clinical data have demonstrated promising efficacy and manageable safety profiles of both chimeric antigen receptor T-cell and bispecific antibody therapies in heavily pretreated relapsed/refractory MM. However, most patients suffer from relapses at later time points, and the mechanism of resistance remains largely unknown. Theoretically, loss of antigen is a potential tumor-intrinsic resistance mechanism against BCMA-targeted immunotherapies. Strategies to overcome this kind of drug resistance are, therefore, needed. In this review, we discuss the loss of BCMA in the new epoch of immunotherapy for MM.

Indexed as

Antibodies, BispecificMultiple MyelomaReceptors, Chimeric AntigenB-Cell Maturation AntigenBiologyHumansImmunotherapyImmunotherapy, AdoptiveNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalAntibodies, BispecificB-Cell Maturation AntigenReceptors, Chimeric Antigen

Identifiers

PMID36263838
PMCPMC10071122
OpenAlexW4306912324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.