Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36263813›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2022

Catalytically inactive DNA ligase IV promotes DNA repair in living cells.

Noah J Goff, Manon Brenière, Christopher J Buehl, Abinadabe J de Melo, Hana Huskova, Takashi Ochi, Tom L Blundell, Weifeng Mao, Kefei Yu, Mauro Modesti and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The flexible and iterative steps within the NHEJ pathway.Progress in biophysics and molecular biology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Noah J GoffCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.
Manon BrenièreCentre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Marseille, CNRS UMR7258, Inserm U1068, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Aix-Marseille Universiteé, Marseille, France.
Christopher J BuehlCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.
Abinadabe J de MeloCentre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Marseille, CNRS UMR7258, Inserm U1068, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Aix-Marseille Universiteé, Marseille, France.
Hana HuskovaCentre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Marseille, CNRS UMR7258, Inserm U1068, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Aix-Marseille Universiteé, Marseille, France.
Takashi OchiThe Astbury Centre for Structural Molecular Biology, School of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9TJ, UK.
Tom L BlundellDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1GA, UK.
Weifeng MaoCollege of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.
Kefei YuCollege of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.
Mauro ModestiCentre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Marseille, CNRS UMR7258, Inserm U1068, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Aix-Marseille Universiteé, Marseille, France.
Katheryn MeekCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0454-4414
Michigan State University · USCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRUniversity of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Leeds · GB

Funding

Defining the mechanistic basis of ATM’s impact on VDJ recombinationR01AI147634 · NIAID · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MEEK, KATHERYN D, YU, KEFEI · 2019 to 2024
$1.9M
Does overexpression of DNA polymerase theta sensitize cancers to G-quadruplex binding drugs?R21CA240875 · NCI · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MEEK, KATHERYN D · 2019 to 2020
$371k
NCI NIH HHS R21 CA240875NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI147634
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) are induced by external genotoxic agents (ionizing radiation or genotoxins) or by internal processes (recombination intermediates in lymphocytes or by replication errors). The DNA ends induced by these genotoxic processes are often not ligatable, requiring potentially mutagenic end-processing to render ends compatible for ligation by non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ). Using single molecule approaches, Loparo et al. propose that NHEJ fidelity can be maintained by restricting end-processing to a ligation competent short-range NHEJ complex that 'maximizes the fidelity of DNA repair'. These in vitro studies show that although this short-range NHEJ complex requires DNA ligase IV (Lig4), its catalytic activity is dispensable. Here using cellular models, we show that inactive Lig4 robustly promotes DNA repair in living cells. Compared to repair products from wild-type cells, those isolated from cells with inactive Lig4 show a somewhat increased fraction that utilize micro-homology (MH) at the joining site consistent with alternative end-joining (a-EJ). But unlike a-EJ in the absence of NHEJ, a large percentage of joints isolated from cells with inactive Lig4 occur with no MH - thus, clearly distinct from a-EJ. Finally, biochemical assays demonstrate that the inactive Lig4 complex promotes the activity of DNA ligase III (Lig3).

Indexed as

DNA End-Joining RepairDNA RepairBiocatalysisDNADNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDNA Ligase ATPDNA LigasesDNADNA Ligase ATPDNA Ligases

Identifiers

PMID36263813
PMCPMC9638927
OpenAlexW4306871069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.