Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36263479›Full record

SynthesisCurrent neuropharmacology2023

Ibogaine/Noribogaine in the Treatment of Substance Use Disorders: A Systematic Review of the Current Literature.

Alessio Mosca, Stefania Chiappini, Andrea Miuli, Gianluca Mancusi, Maria Chiara Santovito, Francesco Di Carlo, Mauro Pettorruso, John M Corkery, Carlos Canessa, Giovanni Martinotti and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Current neuropharmacology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Alessio MoscaDepartment of Neurosciences, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, Università degli Studi G. D'Annunzio, Chieti-Pescara, 66100, Italy.
Stefania ChiappiniDepartment of Neurosciences, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, Università degli Studi G. D'Annunzio, Chieti-Pescara, 66100, Italy.
Andrea MiuliDepartment of Neurosciences, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, Università degli Studi G. D'Annunzio, Chieti-Pescara, 66100, Italy.
Gianluca MancusiDepartment of Neurosciences, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, Università degli Studi G. D'Annunzio, Chieti-Pescara, 66100, Italy.
Maria Chiara SantovitoDepartment of Neurosciences, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, Università degli Studi G. D'Annunzio, Chieti-Pescara, 66100, Italy.
Francesco Di CarloDepartment of Neurosciences, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, Università degli Studi G. D'Annunzio, Chieti-Pescara, 66100, Italy.
Mauro PettorrusoDepartment of Neurosciences, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, Università degli Studi G. D'Annunzio, Chieti-Pescara, 66100, Italy.
John M CorkeryPsychopharmacology, Drug Misuse and Novel Psychoactive Substances Research Unit, School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hertfordshire, AL10 9AB, UK.
Carlos CanessaThe Elms Surgery, Watford, Hertfordshire, WD17 4NT, UK.
Giovanni MartinottiDepartment of Neurosciences, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, Università degli Studi G. D'Annunzio, Chieti-Pescara, 66100, Italy.
Massimo Di GiannantonioDepartment of Neurosciences, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, Università degli Studi G. D'Annunzio, Chieti-Pescara, 66100, Italy.
University of Chieti-Pescara · ITUniversity of Hertfordshire · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIbogaine and noribogaine are psychedelic substances with dissociative properties naturally occurring in plants of the Apocynaceae family. Research has shown their efficacy in treating substance use disorders (SUD), particularly in opiate detoxification, but their efficacy and toxicity are still unclear.

objectiveThis review aims to assess the anti-addictive role of ibogaine and evaluate its side effects.

methodsA systematic literature review was conducted on the 29th of November 2021 using PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science databases through the following search strategy: ("Ibogaine" OR "Noribogaine") AND ("SUD" OR "substance use disorder" OR "craving" OR "abstinence" OR "withdrawal" OR "addiction" OR "detoxification") NOT animal NOT review NOT "vitro." The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) was followed for data gathering purposes. Research methods were registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021287034).

resultsThirty-one articles were selected for the systematic revision, and two were considered for analysis. The results were organised according to the type of study: case reports/case series, randomised- controlled trials (RCTs), open-label, survey and observational studies. The main outcomes were related to the anti-addictive effect of ibogaine and its cardiac toxicity. A meta-analysis of side effects was conducted using RevMan 5.4 software, showing a significant risk of developing headaches after ibogaine/noribogaine treatment.

conclusionThe results show some efficacy of ibogaine in the treatment of SUDs, but its cardiotoxicity and mortality are worrying. Further studies are needed to assess its therapeutic efficacy and actual safety.

Indexed as

IbogaineSubstance-Related DisordersHumansIbogainenoribogaineaddictionIbogainenoribogainepsychedelicssubstance use disorderwithdrawal symptoms

Identifiers

PMID36263479
PMCPMC10556383
OpenAlexW4306912803

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.