ReviewFrontiers in genetics2022
Domestication of newly evolved hexaploid wheat-A journey of wild grass to cultivated wheat.
Review in Frontiers in genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative cytogenomic characterization of 18 wheat core collection cultivars from six continents using triple-color PLOP-FISH.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026Article
- Polyploidy and Mutagenic Germplasm Innovation in Minor Legumes: Paradigm Shift and Challenges from Model Crops to Mung Bean.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Physiological and molecular responses of bread wheat and its wild relative species to drought stress.Molecular biology reports · 2025Article
- Genome editing for sustainable agriculture in Peru: advances, potential applications and regulation.Frontiers in genome editing · 2025Review
- Climate Change-The Rise of Climate-Resilient Crops.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Wheat quality: A review on chemical composition, nutritional attributes, grain anatomy, types, classification, and function of seed storage proteins in bread making quality.Frontiers in nutrition · 2023Review
- Altered regulation of flowering expands growth ranges and maximizes yields in major crops.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Review
- Pollen viability-based heat susceptibility index (HSIpv): A useful selection criterion for heat-tolerant genotypes in wheat.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Domestication of wheat started with the dawn of human civilization. Since then, improvement in various traits including resistance to diseases, insect pests, saline and drought stresses, grain yield, and quality were improved through selections by early farmers and then planned hybridization after the discovery of Mendel's laws. In the 1950s, genetic variability was created using mutagens followed by the selection of superior mutants. Over the last 3 decades, research was focused on developing superior hybrids, initiating marker-assisted selection and targeted breeding, and developing genetically modified wheat to improve the grain yield, tolerance to drought, salinity, terminal heat and herbicide, and nutritive quality. Acceptability of genetically modified wheat by the end-user remained a major hurdle in releasing into the environment. Since the beginning of the 21
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.